Bridging the clinical equivalence gap: a nationwide survey on healthcare professionals' perceptions of whole blood-derived versus apheresis platelets in China

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence supporting the clinical equivalence of whole blood-derived platelets (WBDP) and apheresis platelets (AP), AP remains the dominant choice for platelet transfusions in many countries. This study aimed to assess Chinese healthcare professionals' preferences, barriers, and conditional acceptance of WBDP as an alternative to AP, especially in the context of platelet shortages and rising clinical demand. METHODS: A nationwide survey targeting physicians, transfusionists, and blood center staff was conducted via the WeChat Mini Program. The survey included 35 questions focusing on attitudes toward AP and WBDP, particularly regarding safety, efficacy, and barriers to WBDP adoption. A total of 781 participants from various healthcare institutions across China completed the survey. RESULTS: A substantial majority of physicians (78.41%) and transfusionists (93.88%) exhibited a preference for AP compared to WBDP, safety (77.54% and 86.12%) and clinical efficacy (63.77% and 84.9%) as primary factors. Surprisingly, 94.32% of physicians and 89.59% of transfusionists expressed willingness to use WBDP when AP is unavailable, primarily due to blood resource shortages. One of the key findings of this task was that merely 31% of blood center staff and 27% of their hospital customers acknowledged the clinical equivalence between AP and WBDP, with 47% and 53% expressing no opinion. Key barriers to WBDP adoption included concerns over transfusion reactions (92%), efficacy (72%), and safety (68%). To improve the current situation, the following strategies were identified to enhance WBDP adoption: increasing clinical research (60.87%) and physician education (46.96%). CONCLUSION: This survey highlights significant reservations among healthcare professionals regarding the clinical equivalence and safety of WBDP. Future efforts should focus on bridging the knowledge gap, optimizing WBDP collection and distribution, and promoting the rational use of both platelet products to address shortages and ensure high-quality patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.106453
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the clinical equivalence gap: a nationwide survey on healthcare professionals' perceptions of whole blood-derived versus apheresis platelets in China

Yu Wen, Wei Dong Zhang, Ning Zhang, Tie Cheng Sun et al.
Hematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Blood donation and transfusion practices
article

Bridging the clinical equivalence gap: a nationwide survey on healthcare professionals' perceptions of whole blood-derived versus apheresis platelets in China

Yu Wen, Wei Dong Zhang, Ning Zhang, Tie Cheng Sun, Di Wu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence supporting the clinical equivalence of whole blood-derived platelets (WBDP) and apheresis platelets (AP), AP remains the dominant choice for platelet transfusions in many countries. This study aimed to assess Chinese healthcare professionals' preferences, barriers, and conditional acceptance of WBDP as an alternative to AP, especially in the context of platelet shortages and rising clinical demand. METHODS: A nationwide survey targeting physicians, transfusionists, and blood center staff was conducted via the WeChat Mini Program. The survey included 35 questions focusing on attitudes toward AP and WBDP, particularly regarding safety, efficacy, and barriers to WBDP adoption. A total of 781 participants from various healthcare institutions across China completed the survey. RESULTS: A substantial majority of physicians (78.41%) and transfusionists (93.88%) exhibited a preference for AP compared to WBDP, safety (77.54% and 86.12%) and clinical efficacy (63.77% and 84.9%) as primary factors. Surprisingly, 94.32% of physicians and 89.59% of transfusionists expressed willingness to use WBDP when AP is unavailable, primarily due to blood resource shortages. One of the key findings of this task was that merely 31% of blood center staff and 27% of their hospital customers acknowledged the clinical equivalence between AP and WBDP, with 47% and 53% expressing no opinion. Key barriers to WBDP adoption included concerns over transfusion reactions (92%), efficacy (72%), and safety (68%). To improve the current situation, the following strategies were identified to enhance WBDP adoption: increasing clinical research (60.87%) and physician education (46.96%). CONCLUSION: This survey highlights significant reservations among healthcare professionals regarding the clinical equivalence and safety of WBDP. Future efforts should focus on bridging the knowledge gap, optimizing WBDP collection and distribution, and promoting the rational use of both platelet products to address shortages and ensure high-quality patient care.

Hematology Transfusion and Cell TherapyVol. 48(3)
Beijing Red Cross Blood Center (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.