Group-Related Psychosocial Working Conditions and Individual Health Impairment: A Multilevel Approach That Reflects Intragroup Agreement

Abstract: Psychosocial job characteristics are typically examined at the individual level, whereas psychosocial risk assessment (PRA) relies on group-level averages to evaluate work-related health risks. This study investigates how group-level averages of psychosocial risk factors, collected in the context of PRA, relate to individual health risks. Using data from 9,238 employees across 32 organizations, we applied a three-level generalized mixed model to estimate associations between group-level psychosocial risk factors and individual burnout and explored whether within-group agreement influences these associations. Group-level demands and resources showed meaningful associations with individual burnout, whereas the effects of within-group agreement were inconsistent. These findings suggest that aggregated workplace-group scores reflect relevant aspects of psychosocial risk and can inform PRA. Incorporating group-level perspectives extends current theoretical and methodological considerations beyond individual data and may support a more nuanced interpretation of PRA results when identifying areas that could benefit from targeted preventive measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000475
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group-Related Psychosocial Working Conditions and Individual Health Impairment: A Multilevel Approach That Reflects Intragroup Agreement

Jan Dettmers, Ivon Ames
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Group-Related Psychosocial Working Conditions and Individual Health Impairment: A Multilevel Approach That Reflects Intragroup Agreement

Jan Dettmers, Ivon Ames
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Psychosocial job characteristics are typically examined at the individual level, whereas psychosocial risk assessment (PRA) relies on group-level averages to evaluate work-related health risks. This study investigates how group-level averages of psychosocial risk factors, collected in the context of PRA, relate to individual health risks. Using data from 9,238 employees across 32 organizations, we applied a three-level generalized mixed model to estimate associations between group-level psychosocial risk factors and individual burnout and explored whether within-group agreement influences these associations. Group-level demands and resources showed meaningful associations with individual burnout, whereas the effects of within-group agreement were inconsistent. These findings suggest that aggregated workplace-group scores reflect relevant aspects of psychosocial risk and can inform PRA. Incorporating group-level perspectives extends current theoretical and methodological considerations beyond individual data and may support a more nuanced interpretation of PRA results when identifying areas that could benefit from targeted preventive measures.

Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.