The Making of Vulnerability. An ethnographic study exploring vulnerability in specialized outpatient care for pregnant persons with diabetes in Denmark.

This article examines how vulnerability is enacted in specialized outpatient care for pregnant persons with diabetes in Denmark. The analysis draws on ten months of ethnographic fieldwork, including observations of 79 consultations with 33 pregnant persons and around 20 health professionals. Rather than treating vulnerability as a stable trait or individual circumstance, we approach it as something done through administrative classifications, psychiatric histories, insulin thresholds, anticipatory reasoning, and cross-sectoral coordination. We trace how institutional formats shape which concerns become legible, actionable, or stalled, with uneven consequences for care, including intensified surveillance, delayed transfer, early induction, and fragmented follow-up. By shifting attention from who is vulnerable to how vulnerability is made actionable, the study contributes to debates in medical anthropology and critical public health on inequity, arguing that equity depends on sustaining adaptable, revisable institutional practices rather than fixed solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119315
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Making of Vulnerability. An ethnographic study exploring vulnerability in specialized outpatient care for pregnant persons with diabetes in Denmark.

Viola Burau, Tine Brink Henriksen, Mette Mørup Schlütter, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
Social Science & Medicine
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

The Making of Vulnerability. An ethnographic study exploring vulnerability in specialized outpatient care for pregnant persons with diabetes in Denmark.

Viola Burau, Tine Brink Henriksen, Mette Mørup Schlütter, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
article en

Abstract

This article examines how vulnerability is enacted in specialized outpatient care for pregnant persons with diabetes in Denmark. The analysis draws on ten months of ethnographic fieldwork, including observations of 79 consultations with 33 pregnant persons and around 20 health professionals. Rather than treating vulnerability as a stable trait or individual circumstance, we approach it as something done through administrative classifications, psychiatric histories, insulin thresholds, anticipatory reasoning, and cross-sectoral coordination. We trace how institutional formats shape which concerns become legible, actionable, or stalled, with uneven consequences for care, including intensified surveillance, delayed transfer, early induction, and fragmented follow-up. By shifting attention from who is vulnerable to how vulnerability is made actionable, the study contributes to debates in medical anthropology and critical public health on inequity, arguing that equity depends on sustaining adaptable, revisable institutional practices rather than fixed solutions.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 400
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.