A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Low-Viscosity with Comparator 0.3% Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of a low-viscosity 0.3% hyaluronic acid (HA) ophthalmic solution with those of a comparator 0.3% HA formulation in patients with dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial, patients with mild-to-moderate DED were allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-viscosity or comparator 0.3% HA eye drops. Participants instilled the assigned study medications 5-6 times daily for 12 weeks, and a follow-up evaluation was conducted 1 week after the final instillation. The primary end point was the mean change in the corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included the conjunctival staining score, tear break-up time (TBUT), nonanesthetized Schirmer test results, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and ocular soreness. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included in the full analysis set. The change in CFS score at week 12 (-0.03; 95% CI -0.1873 to 0.1346) met the predefined noninferiority margin. Compared with the baseline parameters, both formulations significantly improved all ocular surface parameters except ocular soreness score (all P < 0.01). No significant between-group differences were observed across all secondary outcomes. Notably, blurred vision immediately after instillation was significantly less frequent in the low-viscosity HA group at all time points (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the comparator 0.3% HA formulation, the low-viscosity 0.3% HA formulation demonstrated comparable therapeutic benefits while reducing the incidence of viscosity-related adverse events. These findings indicated that the low-viscosity 0.3% HA ophthalmic solution may serve as a clinically meaningful alternative for patients with mild-to-moderate DED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06388070.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01372-7
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Low-Viscosity with Comparator 0.3% Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Jae‐Joong Kim, Chul Young Choi, Jae Woong Koh, Eun Chul Kim et al.
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing Low-Viscosity with Comparator 0.3% Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Jae‐Joong Kim, Chul Young Choi, Jae Woong Koh, Eun Chul Kim, Seong Jae Kim, DaHye Jung, Hong Kyun Kim, Young Ju Shin, Tae-im Kim, Jong Soo Lee, Dong Hyun Kim
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of a low-viscosity 0.3% hyaluronic acid (HA) ophthalmic solution with those of a comparator 0.3% HA formulation in patients with dry eye disease (DED). METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority clinical trial, patients with mild-to-moderate DED were allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either low-viscosity or comparator 0.3% HA eye drops. Participants instilled the assigned study medications 5-6 times daily for 12 weeks, and a follow-up evaluation was conducted 1 week after the final instillation. The primary end point was the mean change in the corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included the conjunctival staining score, tear break-up time (TBUT), nonanesthetized Schirmer test results, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and ocular soreness. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included in the full analysis set. The change in CFS score at week 12 (-0.03; 95% CI -0.1873 to 0.1346) met the predefined noninferiority margin. Compared with the baseline parameters, both formulations significantly improved all ocular surface parameters except ocular soreness score (all P < 0.01). No significant between-group differences were observed across all secondary outcomes. Notably, blurred vision immediately after instillation was significantly less frequent in the low-viscosity HA group at all time points (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the comparator 0.3% HA formulation, the low-viscosity 0.3% HA formulation demonstrated comparable therapeutic benefits while reducing the incidence of viscosity-related adverse events. These findings indicated that the low-viscosity 0.3% HA ophthalmic solution may serve as a clinically meaningful alternative for patients with mild-to-moderate DED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06388070.

Ophthalmology and Therapy
Hallym University (KR), Chosun University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Korea University (KR), Kyungpook National University Hospital (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Gyeongsang National University Hospital (KR), Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Huons (South Korea) (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.