A real options approach for valuing storage contracts of hydrogen–methane gas blends

Decarbonization and growth of variable renewable generation have increased interest in hydrogen as a low-carbon energy carrier. Underground hydrogen storage in geological formations is one of the few scalable options for large-capacity energy storage, and retrofitting existing natural gas infrastructure to store methane–hydrogen blends offers a practical transition pathway. Yet valuing such storage contracts is difficult because hydrogen markets remain immature. This paper develops a real-options framework for methane–hydrogen storage contracts with a prescribed hydrogen energy fraction. Extending the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman approach used for natural gas storage, the model incorporates stochastic hydrogen prices and blend-specific operational constraints, including reduced effective energy capacity. Contract values and optimal operating policies are computed by solving a multi-factor HJB equation with a semi-implicit finite-difference scheme. The framework is verified against natural gas benchmarks and assessed by Monte Carlo cash-flow evaluation. Results show how value and policies depend on blend ratio, volatility, capacity, and contract duration. • We propose a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman framework to price underground H 2 –CH 4 storage contracts. • The optimal control PDE is used to value contracts under various price dynamics and operating constraints. • The proposed model can inform the design of subsidies and incentives to de-risk hydrogen storage investments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154879
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A real options approach for valuing storage contracts of hydrogen–methane gas blends

Antonio Lara, Andrés Soage, Vicente Alcaraz Carrillo de Albornoz, Luis Cueto‐Felgueroso
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
article

A real options approach for valuing storage contracts of hydrogen–methane gas blends

Antonio Lara, Andrés Soage, Vicente Alcaraz Carrillo de Albornoz, Luis Cueto‐Felgueroso
article en

Abstract

Decarbonization and growth of variable renewable generation have increased interest in hydrogen as a low-carbon energy carrier. Underground hydrogen storage in geological formations is one of the few scalable options for large-capacity energy storage, and retrofitting existing natural gas infrastructure to store methane–hydrogen blends offers a practical transition pathway. Yet valuing such storage contracts is difficult because hydrogen markets remain immature. This paper develops a real-options framework for methane–hydrogen storage contracts with a prescribed hydrogen energy fraction. Extending the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman approach used for natural gas storage, the model incorporates stochastic hydrogen prices and blend-specific operational constraints, including reduced effective energy capacity. Contract values and optimal operating policies are computed by solving a multi-factor HJB equation with a semi-implicit finite-difference scheme. The framework is verified against natural gas benchmarks and assessed by Monte Carlo cash-flow evaluation. Results show how value and policies depend on blend ratio, volatility, capacity, and contract duration. • We propose a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman framework to price underground H 2 –CH 4 storage contracts. • The optimal control PDE is used to value contracts under various price dynamics and operating constraints. • The proposed model can inform the design of subsidies and incentives to de-risk hydrogen storage investments.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 233
Universidade da Coruña (ES), Numerical Method (China) (CN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
European Commission, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.