YouTube as a source of information on the non-pharmacological treatment of COPD

BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requires both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Patients increasingly seek health-related information on platforms such as YouTube. However, the usefulness of YouTube videos on the treatment of COPD is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the usefulness of YouTube videos on the non-pharmacological treatment of COPD. METHODS: Search terms were "COPD", "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" and "Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease", and videos with >30,000 views and non-pharmacological content were included. Two independent reviewers assessed quality using standardized tools: Modified DISCERN, Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score. RESULTS: Among 97 videos, 86% were "useful", 13% "misleading", and 1% "neither". 62% of the misleading videos contained misinformation on the nutritional management of COPD. 85% of all misleading videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals. Misleading videos received significantly more engagement (total p-values <0.05). Scores on the Modified DISCERN (p = 0.015) and JAMA benchmark criteria (p = 0.021) were significantly higher for useful videos compared to misleading ones, while the Global Quality Score (p = 0.253) was less effective at distinguishing between the two categories. CONCLUSION: YouTube videos on non-pharmacological treatment of COPD are of high quality; however, nutrition-focused misinformation is widespread and tends to attract disproportionately high engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2026.108838
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

YouTube as a source of information on the non-pharmacological treatment of COPD

Jens Rikardt Andersen, Simon Høj, Howraman Meteran, Rikke Kristensen et al.
Respiratory Medicine
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

YouTube as a source of information on the non-pharmacological treatment of COPD

Jens Rikardt Andersen, Simon Høj, Howraman Meteran, Rikke Kristensen, Sara Klöczl Kring
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requires both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Patients increasingly seek health-related information on platforms such as YouTube. However, the usefulness of YouTube videos on the treatment of COPD is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the usefulness of YouTube videos on the non-pharmacological treatment of COPD. METHODS: Search terms were "COPD", "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" and "Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease", and videos with >30,000 views and non-pharmacological content were included. Two independent reviewers assessed quality using standardized tools: Modified DISCERN, Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score. RESULTS: Among 97 videos, 86% were "useful", 13% "misleading", and 1% "neither". 62% of the misleading videos contained misinformation on the nutritional management of COPD. 85% of all misleading videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals. Misleading videos received significantly more engagement (total p-values <0.05). Scores on the Modified DISCERN (p = 0.015) and JAMA benchmark criteria (p = 0.021) were significantly higher for useful videos compared to misleading ones, while the Global Quality Score (p = 0.253) was less effective at distinguishing between the two categories. CONCLUSION: YouTube videos on non-pharmacological treatment of COPD are of high quality; however, nutrition-focused misinformation is widespread and tends to attract disproportionately high engagement.

Respiratory MedicineVol. 257
University of Copenhagen (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.