Genetic manipulation technologies for precise cellular control: a comparative review of five approaches

Genetic manipulation technologies have revolutionized our ability to control cellular activities with high precision. Five major approaches-chemogenetics, optogenetics, odorgenetics, magnetogenetics, and sonogenetics-offer distinct advantages for different research and therapeutic scenarios. However, a unified framework for systematic comparison across these technologies has been lacking.This review provides a comprehensive analysis of these five genetic manipulation technologies from three perspectives: molecular mechanisms, quantitative performance metrics, and application scenarios. We first dissect the signaling pathways and key molecular components underlying each technology. We then establish a seven-dimensional evaluation framework encompassing spatiotemporal resolution, tissue penetration, cell-type specificity, reversibility, multiplexing capability, biosafety, and technical accessibility. Using this framework, we systematically score and compare the five technologies, revealing that optogenetics excels in spatiotemporal precision (millisecond/micrometer scale), chemogenetics offers superior clinical translatability, while sonogenetics and magnetogenetics provide advantages for non-invasive deep tissue applications. We further analyze optimal application scenarios for each technology, including neural circuit dissection, chronic disease management, and deep tissue intervention.This comparative analysis provides researchers with an evidence-based guide for technology selection. We propose that future developments should focus on hybrid approaches combining the strengths of multiple technologies, and on addressing current limitations in delivery efficiency and long-term biosafety for clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1818170
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic manipulation technologies for precise cellular control: a comparative review of five approaches

Qin Xiao, Jia Li, Xueqin Xu, Yanqiong Wu et al.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
article

Genetic manipulation technologies for precise cellular control: a comparative review of five approaches

Qin Xiao, Jia Li, Xueqin Xu, Yanqiong Wu, Jing Liu, Ying Cao, Changbin Ke, Panpan Sun
article en

Abstract

Genetic manipulation technologies have revolutionized our ability to control cellular activities with high precision. Five major approaches-chemogenetics, optogenetics, odorgenetics, magnetogenetics, and sonogenetics-offer distinct advantages for different research and therapeutic scenarios. However, a unified framework for systematic comparison across these technologies has been lacking.This review provides a comprehensive analysis of these five genetic manipulation technologies from three perspectives: molecular mechanisms, quantitative performance metrics, and application scenarios. We first dissect the signaling pathways and key molecular components underlying each technology. We then establish a seven-dimensional evaluation framework encompassing spatiotemporal resolution, tissue penetration, cell-type specificity, reversibility, multiplexing capability, biosafety, and technical accessibility. Using this framework, we systematically score and compare the five technologies, revealing that optogenetics excels in spatiotemporal precision (millisecond/micrometer scale), chemogenetics offers superior clinical translatability, while sonogenetics and magnetogenetics provide advantages for non-invasive deep tissue applications. We further analyze optimal application scenarios for each technology, including neural circuit dissection, chronic disease management, and deep tissue intervention.This comparative analysis provides researchers with an evidence-based guide for technology selection. We propose that future developments should focus on hybrid approaches combining the strengths of multiple technologies, and on addressing current limitations in delivery efficiency and long-term biosafety for clinical translation.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 14
Hubei University of Medicine (CN), Hubei Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.