Temporal Structure of Reward Availability and Sensory Uncertainty Modulate Allocation Dynamics in Naturalistic Foraging

Adaptive foraging requires animals to combine uncertain sensory cues with predictions about when rewards are likely to occur. While theoretical models describe how animals should allocate their effort under variable-interval reward schedules, it remains unclear how the timing or rewards and the reliability of sensory cues affects behavior. We developed a continuous foraging task in which freely moving macaque monkeys navigated among three reward patches. Rewards became available at unpredictable times, with their availability signaled by a visual cue of varying reliability. We also varied the schedule of reward availability: in some conditions, rewards were equally likely to become available at any moment (exponentially distributed intervals), while in others the interval distribution was more concentrated around a particular mean (gamma-distributed intervals) which increased the cost of premature responses. Under exponential schedules, monkeys eventually allocated their time at different patches according to reward schedules, and cue reliability had only modest effects. Under gamma-distributed intervals, monkeys more quickly learned to differentiate between patches. Their choices were more strongly dependent on predicted reward timing, particularly when sensory cues were highly reliable. These results show that both the timing of rewards and reliability of sensory cues shape how animals allocate their time and effort in continuous naturalistic foraging tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.14.718537
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal Structure of Reward Availability and Sensory Uncertainty Modulate Allocation Dynamics in Naturalistic Foraging

Cristina Savin, Panos Alefantis, Dora E. Angelaki, Yaxin Guo et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Temporal Structure of Reward Availability and Sensory Uncertainty Modulate Allocation Dynamics in Naturalistic Foraging

Cristina Savin, Panos Alefantis, Dora E. Angelaki, Yaxin Guo, Najib J. Majaj, Xaq Pitkow, Noushin Quazi
article en

Abstract

Adaptive foraging requires animals to combine uncertain sensory cues with predictions about when rewards are likely to occur. While theoretical models describe how animals should allocate their effort under variable-interval reward schedules, it remains unclear how the timing or rewards and the reliability of sensory cues affects behavior. We developed a continuous foraging task in which freely moving macaque monkeys navigated among three reward patches. Rewards became available at unpredictable times, with their availability signaled by a visual cue of varying reliability. We also varied the schedule of reward availability: in some conditions, rewards were equally likely to become available at any moment (exponentially distributed intervals), while in others the interval distribution was more concentrated around a particular mean (gamma-distributed intervals) which increased the cost of premature responses. Under exponential schedules, monkeys eventually allocated their time at different patches according to reward schedules, and cue reliability had only modest effects. Under gamma-distributed intervals, monkeys more quickly learned to differentiate between patches. Their choices were more strongly dependent on predicted reward timing, particularly when sensory cues were highly reliable. These results show that both the timing of rewards and reliability of sensory cues shape how animals allocate their time and effort in continuous naturalistic foraging tasks.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
New York University (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.