Access Denied? Takedown Policies in Community Archives

<div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="section"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> Community archives and their digital collections have allowed marginalized communities to access and share their history and materials on their own terms. Yet, as archival collections continue to be digitized and increase in online accessibility, it is important to consider the stakeholders and ethical implications surrounding sensitive materials. Takedown policies are one way in which issues with the digitization of certain materials can be expressed. When present, these policies enable conversations with community members if concerns are raised about digital content. Since community archives place more emphasis on community needs and desires, these mechanisms of conversation build relationships and trust, especially if there is a history of misrepresentation and exploitation by public institutions. As takedown policies do not have a standard structure, this study poses the research question: To what extent do community archives&rsquo; takedown policies contend with the values articulated in their mission statements? </div> </div> </div> </div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/2mhh-6c18
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access Denied? Takedown Policies in Community Archives

Karel Koon
UNC Libraries
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Access Denied? Takedown Policies in Community Archives

Karel Koon
article en

Abstract

<div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="section"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> Community archives and their digital collections have allowed marginalized communities to access and share their history and materials on their own terms. Yet, as archival collections continue to be digitized and increase in online accessibility, it is important to consider the stakeholders and ethical implications surrounding sensitive materials. Takedown policies are one way in which issues with the digitization of certain materials can be expressed. When present, these policies enable conversations with community members if concerns are raised about digital content. Since community archives place more emphasis on community needs and desires, these mechanisms of conversation build relationships and trust, especially if there is a history of misrepresentation and exploitation by public institutions. As takedown policies do not have a standard structure, this study poses the research question: To what extent do community archives&rsquo; takedown policies contend with the values articulated in their mission statements? </div> </div> </div> </div>

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Access Denied? Takedown Policies in Community Archives — Karel Koon · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS