Generative artificial intelligence for managerial foresight

As organizations increasingly integrate generative AI (GenAI) into decision processes, the nature of managerial foresight is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Although managerial foresight is widely associated with innovation, prior research has largely treated this relationship as direct or processual, overlooking the individual-level cognitive mechanisms through which managerial foresight translates into innovative behavior, particularly in AI-augmented contexts. This study develops and tests a cognitively grounded model linking managerial foresight to innovative behavior through cognitive engagement, and examines how GenAI conditions this relationship. Drawing on a 2×3 factorial experiment with 252 professionals evaluating product innovation scenarios, we manipulate GenAI usage (none, moderate, high). Results reveal a non-linear, inverse U-shaped moderating effect: moderate GenAI use strengthens the indirect effect of managerial foresight on innovative behavior via cognitive engagement, whereas both overreliance and non-use attenuate it. Qualitative evidence shows that excessive GenAI use induces cognitive offloading and fixation, while its absence constrains exploratory thinking. These findings make three contributions. First, we reconceptualize managerial foresight as a cognitively effortful process, identifying cognitive engagement as a critical microfoundation of managerial foresight-driven innovation. Second, we theorize GenAI not as a uniformly beneficial tool, but as a contingent cognitive scaffold that reshapes managerial judgment, with effects depending on intensity of use. Third, we challenge prevailing assumptions of linear AI benefits by demonstrating that both underuse and overuse can undermine innovation. Practically, the study highlights the need to calibrate GenAI use, design managerial foresight practices that sustain cognitive effort, and develop managerial capabilities that prevent cognitive disengagement and overreliance. • This study examines how generative AI conditions the relationship between managerial foresight and innovative behavior. • We employ a mixed-methods design combining a 2×3 factorial experiment with 252 professionals and qualitative analysis. • Managerial foresight influences innovative behavior indirectly through cognitive engagement as a mediating mechanism. • Generative AI exhibits an inverse U-shaped moderating effect: moderate use supports cognitive engagement, whereas high and no use diminish it. • Calibrated GenAI integration strengthens the managerial foresight–innovation relationship by sustaining cognitive engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2026.103831
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative artificial intelligence for managerial foresight

Luna Leoni, Matteo Cristofaro, Mie Augier
Futures
AI and HR Technologies
article

Generative artificial intelligence for managerial foresight

Luna Leoni, Matteo Cristofaro, Mie Augier
article en

Abstract

As organizations increasingly integrate generative AI (GenAI) into decision processes, the nature of managerial foresight is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Although managerial foresight is widely associated with innovation, prior research has largely treated this relationship as direct or processual, overlooking the individual-level cognitive mechanisms through which managerial foresight translates into innovative behavior, particularly in AI-augmented contexts. This study develops and tests a cognitively grounded model linking managerial foresight to innovative behavior through cognitive engagement, and examines how GenAI conditions this relationship. Drawing on a 2×3 factorial experiment with 252 professionals evaluating product innovation scenarios, we manipulate GenAI usage (none, moderate, high). Results reveal a non-linear, inverse U-shaped moderating effect: moderate GenAI use strengthens the indirect effect of managerial foresight on innovative behavior via cognitive engagement, whereas both overreliance and non-use attenuate it. Qualitative evidence shows that excessive GenAI use induces cognitive offloading and fixation, while its absence constrains exploratory thinking. These findings make three contributions. First, we reconceptualize managerial foresight as a cognitively effortful process, identifying cognitive engagement as a critical microfoundation of managerial foresight-driven innovation. Second, we theorize GenAI not as a uniformly beneficial tool, but as a contingent cognitive scaffold that reshapes managerial judgment, with effects depending on intensity of use. Third, we challenge prevailing assumptions of linear AI benefits by demonstrating that both underuse and overuse can undermine innovation. Practically, the study highlights the need to calibrate GenAI use, design managerial foresight practices that sustain cognitive effort, and develop managerial capabilities that prevent cognitive disengagement and overreliance. • This study examines how generative AI conditions the relationship between managerial foresight and innovative behavior. • We employ a mixed-methods design combining a 2×3 factorial experiment with 252 professionals and qualitative analysis. • Managerial foresight influences innovative behavior indirectly through cognitive engagement as a mediating mechanism. • Generative AI exhibits an inverse U-shaped moderating effect: moderate use supports cognitive engagement, whereas high and no use diminish it. • Calibrated GenAI integration strengthens the managerial foresight–innovation relationship by sustaining cognitive engagement.

FuturesVol. 180
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Naval Postgraduate School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI and HR Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.