Digital competence in health and nursing education: a cross-national comparison between samples from Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire

Introduction: The digital transformation in healthcare requires future professionals to have solid digital skills. Despite the global relevance of digital skills, little is known about how these skills differ in countries with different healthcare and education systems. This study compares the self-assessed digital skills of two institutional samples of healthcare and nursing students in Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire and examines the correlation between perceived competence and the strategies reported for searching for information. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April and May 2025 among 49 students in Germany and 256 students in India. Digital competences were assessed using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire, which covers all five dimensions of the DigComp framework. An open-ended question was used to record the students' strategies for searching for reliable information on the internet. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Levene test, and the t-test for two independent samples. Results: Both cohorts showed acceptable to high internal consistency across all DigKomp 2.2 dimensions. Students in the German cohort reported higher competencies in data processing and evaluation and communication/collaboration, while students from the Indian cohort scored higher in digital content creation, security and problem solving. The exploratory bivariate analysis between the Indian and German samples revealed significant differences in 7 out of 15 items, specifically within the dimensions of digital content creation (3/3 items), Security (2/3 items), data processing & evaluation (1/3 items), and problem solving (1/4 items), whereas no significant differences were found in communication/cooperation (0/2 items). Qualitative responses revealed structured and academically oriented search strategies among German cohort. Indian responses showed greater heterogeneity. Discussion: Digital competence development varies substantially between the two institutional samples, reflecting differences in educational structures, access to digital technologies and national digitalization trajectories. While German students demonstrate strong academically grounded competencies, Indian students exhibit strengths in practical and applied digital competence. These findings underscore the need for context-sensitive digital education strategies that combine structured research competencies with practical digital literacy to prepare students for increasingly digitalized healthcare environments in both countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1801330
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital competence in health and nursing education: a cross-national comparison between samples from Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire

Tim Tischendorf, Tom Schaal, Harshad Hend
Frontiers in Health Services
Digital literacy in education
article

Digital competence in health and nursing education: a cross-national comparison between samples from Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire

Tim Tischendorf, Tom Schaal, Harshad Hend
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The digital transformation in healthcare requires future professionals to have solid digital skills. Despite the global relevance of digital skills, little is known about how these skills differ in countries with different healthcare and education systems. This study compares the self-assessed digital skills of two institutional samples of healthcare and nursing students in Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire and examines the correlation between perceived competence and the strategies reported for searching for information. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April and May 2025 among 49 students in Germany and 256 students in India. Digital competences were assessed using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire, which covers all five dimensions of the DigComp framework. An open-ended question was used to record the students' strategies for searching for reliable information on the internet. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Levene test, and the t-test for two independent samples. Results: Both cohorts showed acceptable to high internal consistency across all DigKomp 2.2 dimensions. Students in the German cohort reported higher competencies in data processing and evaluation and communication/collaboration, while students from the Indian cohort scored higher in digital content creation, security and problem solving. The exploratory bivariate analysis between the Indian and German samples revealed significant differences in 7 out of 15 items, specifically within the dimensions of digital content creation (3/3 items), Security (2/3 items), data processing & evaluation (1/3 items), and problem solving (1/4 items), whereas no significant differences were found in communication/cooperation (0/2 items). Qualitative responses revealed structured and academically oriented search strategies among German cohort. Indian responses showed greater heterogeneity. Discussion: Digital competence development varies substantially between the two institutional samples, reflecting differences in educational structures, access to digital technologies and national digitalization trajectories. While German students demonstrate strong academically grounded competencies, Indian students exhibit strengths in practical and applied digital competence. These findings underscore the need for context-sensitive digital education strategies that combine structured research competencies with practical digital literacy to prepare students for increasingly digitalized healthcare environments in both countries.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 6
Royal College of Nursing (GB), Westsächsische Hochschule Zwickau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.