Hydroabrasive Erosion of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concretes

This study experimentally investigated the hydraulic abrasion performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer concretes reinforced with steel and polypropylene fibers. Twenty-four cylindrical discs (280-mm diameter×100-mm depth) were tested, including conventional concretes (C20, C30, C40) and geopolymer concretes with compressive strengths of 20, 30, and 40 MPa, fiber types (steel, polypropylene), fiber volumes (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%), and exposure durations of 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. The underwater abrasion test simulated wear due to sediment flow by applying cyclic intervals with controlled agitation. In compression, geopolymer mixtures slightly outperformed conventional concretes at C20 and C40, with gains of 36% and 15%, respectively. Tensile splitting strength improved with increasing class, showing up to 77% gains in C40 mixtures. Fibers provided selective benefits: Steel fibers enhanced tensile resistance in higher-strength concretes, whereas polypropylene fibers were more effective in C20 mixtures. However, steel fibers reduced the modulus of elasticity compared with fiber-free matrices. For abrasion, mass loss ranged from 15% to 18% in conventional concretes, 10% in fiber-free geopolymers, 7%–10% in steel fiber–reinforced geopolymers, and about 10% in polypropylene fiber–reinforced geopolymers. Significant improvements occurred mainly at 1.5% fiber volume. Abrasion depth remained below 10 mm, well under standard concrete covers (35–50 mm). Overall, fiber-reinforced geopolymer concretes demonstrated improved durability, confirming their potential as eco-efficient alternatives for submerged and marine infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-2036
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydroabrasive Erosion of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concretes

Aaron Kadima Lukanu Lwa Nzambi, Dênio Ramam Carvalho de Oliveira, Fábio Rogério Mendonça Figueira, Fred Maurício Ferreira da Conceição
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Hydroabrasive Erosion of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concretes

Aaron Kadima Lukanu Lwa Nzambi, Dênio Ramam Carvalho de Oliveira, Fábio Rogério Mendonça Figueira, Fred Maurício Ferreira da Conceição
article en

Abstract

This study experimentally investigated the hydraulic abrasion performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer concretes reinforced with steel and polypropylene fibers. Twenty-four cylindrical discs (280-mm diameter×100-mm depth) were tested, including conventional concretes (C20, C30, C40) and geopolymer concretes with compressive strengths of 20, 30, and 40 MPa, fiber types (steel, polypropylene), fiber volumes (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%), and exposure durations of 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. The underwater abrasion test simulated wear due to sediment flow by applying cyclic intervals with controlled agitation. In compression, geopolymer mixtures slightly outperformed conventional concretes at C20 and C40, with gains of 36% and 15%, respectively. Tensile splitting strength improved with increasing class, showing up to 77% gains in C40 mixtures. Fibers provided selective benefits: Steel fibers enhanced tensile resistance in higher-strength concretes, whereas polypropylene fibers were more effective in C20 mixtures. However, steel fibers reduced the modulus of elasticity compared with fiber-free matrices. For abrasion, mass loss ranged from 15% to 18% in conventional concretes, 10% in fiber-free geopolymers, 7%–10% in steel fiber–reinforced geopolymers, and about 10% in polypropylene fiber–reinforced geopolymers. Significant improvements occurred mainly at 1.5% fiber volume. Abrasion depth remained below 10 mm, well under standard concrete covers (35–50 mm). Overall, fiber-reinforced geopolymer concretes demonstrated improved durability, confirming their potential as eco-efficient alternatives for submerged and marine infrastructure.

Journal of structural design and construction practice.Vol. 31(3)
Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.