Motion mitigation in positron-emission tomography guided radiotherapy delivered on a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator

Background and Purpose: The precision of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-guided radiotherapy may be compromised by motion. To address this, we demonstrated the feasibility of a motion-robust PET-to-magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) pipeline. Materials and Methods: For comparison, PET images of a phantom with a target in a movable insert were acquired under a patient-derived breathing waveform and static conditions. Motion correction using the PET Maximum-Likelihood Motion and Activity (MLMA) reconstruction was compared with static reference and motion-blurred images. Targets were delineated using thresholding based on maximum standardized uptake value, and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plans were generated. Plans were delivered on an MR-linac with and without gating or Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) tracking. Dosimetry was assessed using film measurements, evaluating dose differences and 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates. The pipeline was further evaluated using clinical PET data, delivered with and without gating and tracking after motion correction. Dosimetric evaluation was performed using a cylindrical multi-diode phantom. Results: ). Motion correction reduced dose discrepancies and improved gamma pass rates (72%), with further gains from gating (90.3%) and MLC tracking (98.3%). The measurements of patient simulations showed higher gamma pass rates for the motion-corrected plan (static-delivery: 81.8%, gating: 99.2%, MLC-tracked: 100%) compared to motion-blurred plan (static-delivery: 49.4%, gating: 65.6%, MLC-tracked: 63.6%). Conclusions: A motion-robust PET-to-MR-linac pipeline using motion-corrected PET imaging and MR-guided motion mitigation is technically feasible and enhances dose precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100970
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motion mitigation in positron-emission tomography guided radiotherapy delivered on a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator

Casper Beijst, Pim Borman, Albert J. Everard, Rodrigo José Santo et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Motion mitigation in positron-emission tomography guided radiotherapy delivered on a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator

Casper Beijst, Pim Borman, Albert J. Everard, Rodrigo José Santo, Bas W. Raaymakers, Prescilla Uijtewaal, Hugo W.A.M. de Jong, Martin F. Fast, Cornelis A.T van den Berg
article en

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The precision of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-guided radiotherapy may be compromised by motion. To address this, we demonstrated the feasibility of a motion-robust PET-to-magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) pipeline. Materials and Methods: For comparison, PET images of a phantom with a target in a movable insert were acquired under a patient-derived breathing waveform and static conditions. Motion correction using the PET Maximum-Likelihood Motion and Activity (MLMA) reconstruction was compared with static reference and motion-blurred images. Targets were delineated using thresholding based on maximum standardized uptake value, and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plans were generated. Plans were delivered on an MR-linac with and without gating or Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) tracking. Dosimetry was assessed using film measurements, evaluating dose differences and 3%/3 mm gamma pass rates. The pipeline was further evaluated using clinical PET data, delivered with and without gating and tracking after motion correction. Dosimetric evaluation was performed using a cylindrical multi-diode phantom. Results: ). Motion correction reduced dose discrepancies and improved gamma pass rates (72%), with further gains from gating (90.3%) and MLC tracking (98.3%). The measurements of patient simulations showed higher gamma pass rates for the motion-corrected plan (static-delivery: 81.8%, gating: 99.2%, MLC-tracked: 100%) compared to motion-blurred plan (static-delivery: 49.4%, gating: 65.6%, MLC-tracked: 63.6%). Conclusions: A motion-robust PET-to-MR-linac pipeline using motion-corrected PET imaging and MR-guided motion mitigation is technically feasible and enhances dose precision.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyVol. 39
Utrecht University (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
KWF Kankerbestrijding, Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.