A Comparative Analysis of “Missing Middle” Housing Reforms in North Carolina’s Triangle Region

This study examines the implementation and outcomes of missing middle housing reforms in Durham, Raleigh, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Using interviews with municipal planners and developers, along with analysis of housing production data, the research identifies key factors that influence the success of these policies. Findings indicate that reforms are most effective when they legalize housing types familiar to local builders, maintain consistent and predictable development standards, and are supported by a capable development ecosystem. Uptake is further enhanced through iterative policy adjustments that address permitting, financing, and regulatory barriers. While missing middle housing can increase infill development and diversify housing options, it does not automatically produce affordability for lower-income households or change metro level housing supply. The results suggest that careful attention to design, scale, scope, and implementation processes is critical for maximizing the impact of missing middle housing reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/3d3y-mn88
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of “Missing Middle” Housing Reforms in North Carolina’s Triangle Region

Jackson Dille
UNC Libraries
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

A Comparative Analysis of “Missing Middle” Housing Reforms in North Carolina’s Triangle Region

Jackson Dille
article en

Abstract

This study examines the implementation and outcomes of missing middle housing reforms in Durham, Raleigh, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Using interviews with municipal planners and developers, along with analysis of housing production data, the research identifies key factors that influence the success of these policies. Findings indicate that reforms are most effective when they legalize housing types familiar to local builders, maintain consistent and predictable development standards, and are supported by a capable development ecosystem. Uptake is further enhanced through iterative policy adjustments that address permitting, financing, and regulatory barriers. While missing middle housing can increase infill development and diversify housing options, it does not automatically produce affordability for lower-income households or change metro level housing supply. The results suggest that careful attention to design, scale, scope, and implementation processes is critical for maximizing the impact of missing middle housing reforms.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.