Tissue specific prognostic impact of TP53 and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and ovarian cancers using TCGA data

Abstract Background Although mutations in TP53 and BRCA1/2 are central to the biology of breast and ovarian cancers, their prognostic roles remain debated, with little attention to tissue-specific differences. Understanding whether the same mutation carries opposite survival implications across cancer types could reshape biomarker interpretation. Methods We interrogated TCGA cohorts of breast cancer ( n = 967) and ovarian cancer (OV; n = 571), defining mutation status by non-synonymous variants. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted for clinical covariates. Complete-case subsets were analyzed for robustness. Results In breast cancer, BRCA2 mutations conferred a strikingly adverse prognosis (HR = 3.91; 95% CI, 1.10–13.9; p = 0.034), while BRCA1 and TP53 showed no clear effects. By contrast, in OV, BRCA2 mutations were linked to markedly improved survival (HR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04–0.82; p = 0.018). BRCA1 showed a trend toward benefit, whereas TP53 mutations, though nearly ubiquitous, were not prognostic. Conclusions This work uncovers a paradoxical, tissue-specific divergence in the prognostic value of BRCA2 mutations: detrimental in breast cancer yet favorable in OV. Such opposing effects have not been systematically highlighted before and emphasize the need for cancer-type–tailored biomarker strategies. These results are hypothesis-generating but highlight the translational importance of context in precision oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-026-00599-4
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tissue specific prognostic impact of TP53 and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and ovarian cancers using TCGA data

Parvin Pourmasoumi
Discover Medicine
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Tissue specific prognostic impact of TP53 and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and ovarian cancers using TCGA data

Parvin Pourmasoumi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although mutations in TP53 and BRCA1/2 are central to the biology of breast and ovarian cancers, their prognostic roles remain debated, with little attention to tissue-specific differences. Understanding whether the same mutation carries opposite survival implications across cancer types could reshape biomarker interpretation. Methods We interrogated TCGA cohorts of breast cancer ( n = 967) and ovarian cancer (OV; n = 571), defining mutation status by non-synonymous variants. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted for clinical covariates. Complete-case subsets were analyzed for robustness. Results In breast cancer, BRCA2 mutations conferred a strikingly adverse prognosis (HR = 3.91; 95% CI, 1.10–13.9; p = 0.034), while BRCA1 and TP53 showed no clear effects. By contrast, in OV, BRCA2 mutations were linked to markedly improved survival (HR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04–0.82; p = 0.018). BRCA1 showed a trend toward benefit, whereas TP53 mutations, though nearly ubiquitous, were not prognostic. Conclusions This work uncovers a paradoxical, tissue-specific divergence in the prognostic value of BRCA2 mutations: detrimental in breast cancer yet favorable in OV. Such opposing effects have not been systematically highlighted before and emphasize the need for cancer-type–tailored biomarker strategies. These results are hypothesis-generating but highlight the translational importance of context in precision oncology.

Discover MedicineVol. 3(1)
Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.