Rethinking the Evolution of China’s Urban–Rural Relations: A Dynamic Institutional–Technological–Cognitive Framework

The SDGs and the New Urban Agenda both stress the importance of strengthening urban–rural linkages to promote balanced and inclusive development. Taking China as a case, this paper explores the underlying mechanisms driving the evolution of urban–rural relations. Existing studies have primarily periodized China’s urban–rural relations based on institutional changes, with limited attention to their endogenous evolutionary mechanisms. Drawing on New Institutional Economics, this study develops an “institutional–technological–cognitive” framework. It argues that China’s urban–rural relations have evolved through three stages: prior to the Reform and Opening-Up, institution-led governance resulted in urban–rural separation; in the 1980s–2010s, technological change reshaped the constraints and return structures of factor flows, resulting in urban–rural imbalance; in the 2010s–the present, early urban–rural integration was marked by tensions between cognitive reconstruction and existing institutional arrangements. Throughout the three stages, cognition has evolved from ideological cognition to opportunity-driven cognition and further to value-driven cognition, with its agency continuously strengthening and gradually becoming a key variable influencing the effectiveness of institutional operations and the pathways of technological empowerment. Accordingly, urban–rural relations should be understood not only as the outcome of factor allocation shaped by institutions and technology, but also as a dynamic structure embedded in the evolution of cognition. The advancement of urban–rural integration should place greater emphasis on people-centered cognitive transformation, rather than relying on improvements in factor mobility or population urbanization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083996
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the Evolution of China’s Urban–Rural Relations: A Dynamic Institutional–Technological–Cognitive Framework

Shaohua Qiu, Yanfen Li, Ghee-Thean Lim, Rahmat Siti Rahyla et al.
Sustainability
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Rethinking the Evolution of China’s Urban–Rural Relations: A Dynamic Institutional–Technological–Cognitive Framework

Shaohua Qiu, Yanfen Li, Ghee-Thean Lim, Rahmat Siti Rahyla, Bing Wang
article en

Abstract

The SDGs and the New Urban Agenda both stress the importance of strengthening urban–rural linkages to promote balanced and inclusive development. Taking China as a case, this paper explores the underlying mechanisms driving the evolution of urban–rural relations. Existing studies have primarily periodized China’s urban–rural relations based on institutional changes, with limited attention to their endogenous evolutionary mechanisms. Drawing on New Institutional Economics, this study develops an “institutional–technological–cognitive” framework. It argues that China’s urban–rural relations have evolved through three stages: prior to the Reform and Opening-Up, institution-led governance resulted in urban–rural separation; in the 1980s–2010s, technological change reshaped the constraints and return structures of factor flows, resulting in urban–rural imbalance; in the 2010s–the present, early urban–rural integration was marked by tensions between cognitive reconstruction and existing institutional arrangements. Throughout the three stages, cognition has evolved from ideological cognition to opportunity-driven cognition and further to value-driven cognition, with its agency continuously strengthening and gradually becoming a key variable influencing the effectiveness of institutional operations and the pathways of technological empowerment. Accordingly, urban–rural relations should be understood not only as the outcome of factor allocation shaped by institutions and technology, but also as a dynamic structure embedded in the evolution of cognition. The advancement of urban–rural integration should place greater emphasis on people-centered cognitive transformation, rather than relying on improvements in factor mobility or population urbanization.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Huainan Normal University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Huainan Normal University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.