Predicting slug liquid holdup in a two-phase gas–liquid vertical flow

Abstract The accuracy of existing liquid holdup models is limited to the range of data used in their development. In this study, a dynamic model for predicting liquid holdup in a two-phase gas liquid vertical flow is developed using artificial neural networks and a wider range of actual and synthetic data obtained from Literature. Prior to the model’s development, feature selection was conducted using Matlab’s machine learning algorithms (MRMR, ANOVA, CHI2, Kruskal wallis and ReliefF), to identify the most influential parameters affecting liquid holdup. Although all eight parameters were used in developing the liquid holdup model, the feature-selection results were used to determine the relative importance of each parameter influencing liquid holdup. Feed‑forward ANN models (1–3 hidden layers) were then trained with Levenberg–Marquardt on stratified splits (70/15/15). Regularization (L2) and k‑fold cross‑validation (k = 5) were applied to mitigate overfitting, and performance was evaluated using R 2 , RMSE, average relative error (ARE), and the standard deviation of relative error (SDRE). Results from the analysis reveal that single‑hidden‑layer ANN with 15 neurons was more effective than the two and three hidden layer neural architecture, with overall R 2 ≈ 0.994 and RMSE ≈ 0.051. Across folds, validation performance remained stable. Sensitivity analysis indicates lower superficial gas velocity (Vsg) decreases liquid holdup (H_L) and higher superficial liquid velocity (Vsl) increases liquid hold-up (H_L) within the tested ranges; while pipe diameter and liquid viscosity show positive associations with H_L, consistent with slug hydrodynamics. This study offers a transparent ANN approach for vertical slug holdup within 50–100 mm pipes, spanning $${V}_{sg}=0.11$$ – $$13.15$$ m/s and $${V}_{sl}=0.02$$ – $$2.35$$ m/s ranges, eliminating the need for complex and time-consuming calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-026-00983-y
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting slug liquid holdup in a two-phase gas–liquid vertical flow

Princewill M. Ikpeka, Chibuzo Cosmas Nwanwe, Boniface U. Okonkwo, Ugochukwu I. Duru et al.
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Predicting slug liquid holdup in a two-phase gas–liquid vertical flow

Princewill M. Ikpeka, Chibuzo Cosmas Nwanwe, Boniface U. Okonkwo, Ugochukwu I. Duru, Nicholas N. Omeh, Angela N. Nwachukwu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The accuracy of existing liquid holdup models is limited to the range of data used in their development. In this study, a dynamic model for predicting liquid holdup in a two-phase gas liquid vertical flow is developed using artificial neural networks and a wider range of actual and synthetic data obtained from Literature. Prior to the model’s development, feature selection was conducted using Matlab’s machine learning algorithms (MRMR, ANOVA, CHI2, Kruskal wallis and ReliefF), to identify the most influential parameters affecting liquid holdup. Although all eight parameters were used in developing the liquid holdup model, the feature-selection results were used to determine the relative importance of each parameter influencing liquid holdup. Feed‑forward ANN models (1–3 hidden layers) were then trained with Levenberg–Marquardt on stratified splits (70/15/15). Regularization (L2) and k‑fold cross‑validation (k = 5) were applied to mitigate overfitting, and performance was evaluated using R 2 , RMSE, average relative error (ARE), and the standard deviation of relative error (SDRE). Results from the analysis reveal that single‑hidden‑layer ANN with 15 neurons was more effective than the two and three hidden layer neural architecture, with overall R 2 ≈ 0.994 and RMSE ≈ 0.051. Across folds, validation performance remained stable. Sensitivity analysis indicates lower superficial gas velocity (Vsg) decreases liquid holdup (H_L) and higher superficial liquid velocity (Vsl) increases liquid hold-up (H_L) within the tested ranges; while pipe diameter and liquid viscosity show positive associations with H_L, consistent with slug hydrodynamics. This study offers a transparent ANN approach for vertical slug holdup within 50–100 mm pipes, spanning $${V}_{sg}=0.11$$ – $$13.15$$ m/s and $${V}_{sl}=0.02$$ – $$2.35$$ m/s ranges, eliminating the need for complex and time-consuming calculations.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 73(1)
Texas Tech University (US), Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Federal Polytechnic Nekede (NG), Brunel University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.