Abstract LB421: Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for treatment of immune-related adverse events: Final analysis of the prospective two-arm PRIA study

Abstract Purpose: Checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be steroid-refractory (sr) or steroid-dependent (sd), necessitating second-line therapy. This study compared extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with immunosuppressants (IS) in managing sr/sd-irAEs, balancing irAE mitigation with anti-tumor efficacy. Patients: This prospective, two-arm study analyzed 46 patients (23 ECP, 23 IS) with 12 distinct sr/sd-irAEs and five different tumor entities. Toxicities affected the gastrointestinal tract, skin, lung, musculoskeletal system, and serosal membranes, with up to seven prior treatment lines for irAEs. Patients underwent 12 weeks of either six cycles of ECP or investigator's choice IS, with longitudinal assessment of irAE outcome, quality of life (QoL), tumor response, and blood analyses. Results: At week 12, the ECP group exhibited a higher clinical irAE response rate (94% vs. 81%; p = 0.22), improved QoL scores (p = 0.01) and required significantly less steroids than the IS cohort with 437 mg vs. 1405 mg cumulative prednisolone equivalent, respectively (p = 0.02). ECP patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma showed superior overall survival (15 vs. 10 months; p = 0.02), longer progression-free survival (9 vs. 3 months; p = 0.01), and lower cancer progression rates (33% vs. 67%; p = 0.12) compared to the IS group. ECP was more frequently utilized in multi-toxicity cases (44% vs. 9%; p = 0.016) and in patients with prior second-line treatment refractoriness (39% vs. 17%; p = 0.19). No significant safety concerns were observed with ECP; one fatality in the IS group was linked to infection under immunosuppression. Conclusion: ECP demonstrates clinical superiority over IS in managing sr/sd-irAEs, with a favorable safety profile, and preserved anti-tumor response. A multicenter trial is planned for further investigation. Citation Format: Lisa Wein, Carolin Ertl, Theresa Ruf, Monika Morak, Ying Wang, Christina Schmitt, Xiomara Garza Vazquez, Valerie Glatzel, Richard David-Rus, Mohammed Mitwalli, Jerome Srour, Pia Schöpf, Dirk Tomsitz, Lars E. French, Lucie Heinzerling. Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for treatment of immune-related adverse events: Final analysis of the prospective two-arm PRIA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB421.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb421
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract LB421: Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for treatment of immune-related adverse events: Final analysis of the prospective two-arm PRIA study

Jerome Srour, Pia Schöpf, Ximena Vázquez, Lars E. French et al.
Cancer Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Abstract LB421: Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for treatment of immune-related adverse events: Final analysis of the prospective two-arm PRIA study

Jerome Srour, Pia Schöpf, Ximena Vázquez, Lars E. French, Valerie Glatzel, Y Wang, Monika Morak, Dirk Tomsitz, Richard David-Rus, Carolin Ertl, Mohammed Mitwalli, Theresa Ruf, Lisa Wein, Lucie Heinzerling, Christina Schmitt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be steroid-refractory (sr) or steroid-dependent (sd), necessitating second-line therapy. This study compared extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with immunosuppressants (IS) in managing sr/sd-irAEs, balancing irAE mitigation with anti-tumor efficacy. Patients: This prospective, two-arm study analyzed 46 patients (23 ECP, 23 IS) with 12 distinct sr/sd-irAEs and five different tumor entities. Toxicities affected the gastrointestinal tract, skin, lung, musculoskeletal system, and serosal membranes, with up to seven prior treatment lines for irAEs. Patients underwent 12 weeks of either six cycles of ECP or investigator's choice IS, with longitudinal assessment of irAE outcome, quality of life (QoL), tumor response, and blood analyses. Results: At week 12, the ECP group exhibited a higher clinical irAE response rate (94% vs. 81%; p = 0.22), improved QoL scores (p = 0.01) and required significantly less steroids than the IS cohort with 437 mg vs. 1405 mg cumulative prednisolone equivalent, respectively (p = 0.02). ECP patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma showed superior overall survival (15 vs. 10 months; p = 0.02), longer progression-free survival (9 vs. 3 months; p = 0.01), and lower cancer progression rates (33% vs. 67%; p = 0.12) compared to the IS group. ECP was more frequently utilized in multi-toxicity cases (44% vs. 9%; p = 0.016) and in patients with prior second-line treatment refractoriness (39% vs. 17%; p = 0.19). No significant safety concerns were observed with ECP; one fatality in the IS group was linked to infection under immunosuppression. Conclusion: ECP demonstrates clinical superiority over IS in managing sr/sd-irAEs, with a favorable safety profile, and preserved anti-tumor response. A multicenter trial is planned for further investigation. Citation Format: Lisa Wein, Carolin Ertl, Theresa Ruf, Monika Morak, Ying Wang, Christina Schmitt, Xiomara Garza Vazquez, Valerie Glatzel, Richard David-Rus, Mohammed Mitwalli, Jerome Srour, Pia Schöpf, Dirk Tomsitz, Lars E. French, Lucie Heinzerling. Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for treatment of immune-related adverse events: Final analysis of the prospective two-arm PRIA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB421.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(8_Supplement)
University of Miami (US), University of Toronto (CA), LMU Klinikum (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.