Different aflibercept regimens for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal aflibercept injection for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was initially approved with a regimen consisting of three monthly loading doses followed by maintenance doses every 8 weeks. Alternative regimens with a reduced treatment burden have been explored. The treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen involves gradually extending the treatment interval in accordance with disease activity, and the pro re nata (PRN) regimen involves administering injections only when signs of disease activity are observed during follow-up visits. This study evaluated these alternative regimens aimed at reducing treatment burden in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was adopted for network meta-analysis. Results are presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (1,683 patients with wet AMD) were included in the network meta-analysis. No significant interregimen differences were observed in visual acuity or central retinal thickness. The TAE and PRN regimens required significantly fewer injections than did bimonthly and monthly regimens, respectively (TAE vs. bimonthly: SMD -1.091, 95% CI -2.030 to -0.153; TAE vs. monthly: SMD -3.024, 95% CI -4.584 to -1.465; PRN vs. Bimonthly: SMD -1.919, 95% CI -3.307 to -0.532; PRN vs. Monthly: SMD -3.852, 95% CI -5.717 to -1.988). However, injection count did not differ significantly between the TAE and PRN regimens (TAE vs. PRN: SMD 0.828, 95% CI -0.847 to 2.503). Nonetheless, the TAE regimen was associated with fewer clinic visits than the PRN regimen. CONCLUSION: The TAE regimen maintains efficacy while reducing treatment burden in patients with wet AMD receiving intravitreal aflibercept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jcma.0000000000001379
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different aflibercept regimens for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

S J Chen, Sheng-Chu Chi, Yusheng Chen, H F Chang et al.
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Different aflibercept regimens for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

S J Chen, Sheng-Chu Chi, Yusheng Chen, H F Chang, Tai-Chi Lin, Koji Tanaka
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal aflibercept injection for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was initially approved with a regimen consisting of three monthly loading doses followed by maintenance doses every 8 weeks. Alternative regimens with a reduced treatment burden have been explored. The treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen involves gradually extending the treatment interval in accordance with disease activity, and the pro re nata (PRN) regimen involves administering injections only when signs of disease activity are observed during follow-up visits. This study evaluated these alternative regimens aimed at reducing treatment burden in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was adopted for network meta-analysis. Results are presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (1,683 patients with wet AMD) were included in the network meta-analysis. No significant interregimen differences were observed in visual acuity or central retinal thickness. The TAE and PRN regimens required significantly fewer injections than did bimonthly and monthly regimens, respectively (TAE vs. bimonthly: SMD -1.091, 95% CI -2.030 to -0.153; TAE vs. monthly: SMD -3.024, 95% CI -4.584 to -1.465; PRN vs. Bimonthly: SMD -1.919, 95% CI -3.307 to -0.532; PRN vs. Monthly: SMD -3.852, 95% CI -5.717 to -1.988). However, injection count did not differ significantly between the TAE and PRN regimens (TAE vs. PRN: SMD 0.828, 95% CI -0.847 to 2.503). Nonetheless, the TAE regimen was associated with fewer clinic visits than the PRN regimen. CONCLUSION: The TAE regimen maintains efficacy while reducing treatment burden in patients with wet AMD receiving intravitreal aflibercept.

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Nihon University (JP), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), National Taiwan University (TW), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Wan Fang Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.