A comparative study of industrial and open-source SCADAs to optimize the design of control systems for the IFMIF-DONES plant

This study aims to provide a technological comparison of possible alternatives for supervision and control system implementations to support the design of the IFMIF-DONES (International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility DEMO Oriented Neutron Source) plant and its CODAC (Control, Data Access and Communication) System. A methodology to compare and assess open control frameworks such as EPICS (Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System), versus industrial solutions from different vendors, is presented. The hypothesis to be investigated is that license cost should not be taken as the primary decision factor for choosing the framework, even when considering open-source software as an alternative. The key elements addressed for each solution include reliability, scalability, load balancing, resilience, the costs associated with risks, development effort, future upgrade planning, and maintenance. To ground the analysis, this work examines the essential supervision and control requirements for the IFMIF-DONES particle accelerator, focusing specifically on the top-level services of the central CODAC system. Finally, the study presents illustrative results and provides recommendations for future design activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48987-1
Primary Topic
Industrial Automation and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of industrial and open-source SCADAs to optimize the design of control systems for the IFMIF-DONES plant

Mauro Cappelli, Miguel Damas, Javier Díaz, Javier Cruz-Miranda et al.
Scientific Reports
Industrial Automation and Control Systems
article

A comparative study of industrial and open-source SCADAs to optimize the design of control systems for the IFMIF-DONES plant

Mauro Cappelli, Miguel Damas, Javier Díaz, Javier Cruz-Miranda, Elio Valenzuela
article en

Abstract

This study aims to provide a technological comparison of possible alternatives for supervision and control system implementations to support the design of the IFMIF-DONES (International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility DEMO Oriented Neutron Source) plant and its CODAC (Control, Data Access and Communication) System. A methodology to compare and assess open control frameworks such as EPICS (Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System), versus industrial solutions from different vendors, is presented. The hypothesis to be investigated is that license cost should not be taken as the primary decision factor for choosing the framework, even when considering open-source software as an alternative. The key elements addressed for each solution include reliability, scalability, load balancing, resilience, the costs associated with risks, development effort, future upgrade planning, and maintenance. To ground the analysis, this work examines the essential supervision and control requirements for the IFMIF-DONES particle accelerator, focusing specifically on the top-level services of the central CODAC system. Finally, the study presents illustrative results and provides recommendations for future design activities.

Scientific Reports
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Universidad de Granada (ES), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT)
EUROfusion, European Commission, Universidad de Granada, Euratom Research and Training Programme, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Industrial Automation and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.