Harnessing Longitudinal Health Data for Aging Populations

Importance: Longitudinal data are crucial for understanding rapid population aging in East and Southeast Asia, yet challenges in establishing and managing infrastructures remain undocumented. Objective: To investigate challenges and adaptations across longitudinal aging datasets in East and Southeast Asia and synthesize stakeholder-informed processes and recommendations to guide future study design, implementation, sustainability, and data sharing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews conducted online and in-person from September 2024 to June 2025. Data were analyzed using a combined inductive, deductive, and abductive approach to identify themes related to the life cycle of longitudinal aging studies. Stakeholders were engaged across 13 East and Southeast Asia countries and regions (China, Japan, South Korea, and countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations), and experts from India, the United Kingdom, and the US. Participants were a purposive and snowball sample of 33 stakeholders involved in aging research data collection and management, including principal investigators, coordinators, and data platform leaders, and other key personnel with experience establishing or managing aging-related health datasets. Main Outcomes and Measures: Themes on challenges and strategies in the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and sharing of longitudinal aging data were identified through thematic analysis. An iterative thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns was conducted from January to June 2025. Results: Of 33 participants, 23 (72.7%) were principal investigators or co-principal investigators. Four themes emerged: (1) structural and contextual barriers, including funding instability, collaboration silos, and personnel shortages; (2) adapting research design and logistics to local contexts, addressing cultural differences, data accuracy, and biospecimen handling; (3) retaining funding and staff to ensure sustainability amid external disruptions; and (4) constraints related to data governance, privacy regulations, and limited comparability. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of stakeholders involved in longitudinal aging research data systems, participants described structural and contextual barriers, reported adaptations to local research logistics and design, highlighted sustainability threats related to funding and retention, and identified persistent constraints in data governance and cross-study comparability. These findings suggest that building longitudinal aging data ecosystems in East and Southeast Asia requires context-specific strategies aligned with policies, strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration, improved data harmonization, and intentional inclusion of vulnerable populations to inform healthy aging policy, while yielding stakeholder-informed processes and recommendations to support future cohort development and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.7536
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing Longitudinal Health Data for Aging Populations

Maw Pin Tan, Eric J. Brunner, Sugarmaa Myagmarjav, Chenkai Wu et al.
JAMA Network Open
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Harnessing Longitudinal Health Data for Aging Populations

Maw Pin Tan, Eric J. Brunner, Sugarmaa Myagmarjav, Chenkai Wu, Yunhwan Lee, Yugo Shobugawa, Enying Gong, Jean Woo, Bussarawan Teerawichitchainan, Dararatt Anantanasuwong, W. S. Chu, Khadizah H. Abdul-Mumin, T V Sekher, S. Irudaya Rajan, Taehyun Lee, Wenqian Xu, Shuhan Tang, Xue Bai, Kaixin Zhou, Wei Yang, Vivian W. Q. Lou
article en

Abstract

Importance: Longitudinal data are crucial for understanding rapid population aging in East and Southeast Asia, yet challenges in establishing and managing infrastructures remain undocumented. Objective: To investigate challenges and adaptations across longitudinal aging datasets in East and Southeast Asia and synthesize stakeholder-informed processes and recommendations to guide future study design, implementation, sustainability, and data sharing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews conducted online and in-person from September 2024 to June 2025. Data were analyzed using a combined inductive, deductive, and abductive approach to identify themes related to the life cycle of longitudinal aging studies. Stakeholders were engaged across 13 East and Southeast Asia countries and regions (China, Japan, South Korea, and countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations), and experts from India, the United Kingdom, and the US. Participants were a purposive and snowball sample of 33 stakeholders involved in aging research data collection and management, including principal investigators, coordinators, and data platform leaders, and other key personnel with experience establishing or managing aging-related health datasets. Main Outcomes and Measures: Themes on challenges and strategies in the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and sharing of longitudinal aging data were identified through thematic analysis. An iterative thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns was conducted from January to June 2025. Results: Of 33 participants, 23 (72.7%) were principal investigators or co-principal investigators. Four themes emerged: (1) structural and contextual barriers, including funding instability, collaboration silos, and personnel shortages; (2) adapting research design and logistics to local contexts, addressing cultural differences, data accuracy, and biospecimen handling; (3) retaining funding and staff to ensure sustainability amid external disruptions; and (4) constraints related to data governance, privacy regulations, and limited comparability. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of stakeholders involved in longitudinal aging research data systems, participants described structural and contextual barriers, reported adaptations to local research logistics and design, highlighted sustainability threats related to funding and retention, and identified persistent constraints in data governance and cross-study comparability. These findings suggest that building longitudinal aging data ecosystems in East and Southeast Asia requires context-specific strategies aligned with policies, strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration, improved data harmonization, and intentional inclusion of vulnerable populations to inform healthy aging policy, while yielding stakeholder-informed processes and recommendations to support future cohort development and sustainability.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(4)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), National Institute of Development Administration (TH), National University of Singapore (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Tokyo Future University (JP), King's College London (GB), Lund University (SE), Universiti Brunei Darussalam (BN), La Trobe University (AU), Korea University (KR), International Institute for Population Sciences (IN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), University of Malaya (MY), Wuhan University (CN), Guangzhou Experimental Station (CN), Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences (MN), International Centre for Migration Policy Development (AT), Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (CN), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), Institute for Future Engineering (JP), Duke Kunshan University (CN), University College London (GB), Ajou University (KR), Niigata University (JP), Hubei University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.