Impact of Nucleotide Flexibility on Aptamer–Protein Recognition: RNA vs RNA–DNA Chimera

Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acid molecules that bind specifically and strongly to target molecules by adopting a unique tertiary structure that fits the target molecule. They have a wide range of biomedical applications, including disease treatment and diagnosis. Two types of aptamers exist: DNA aptamers and RNA aptamers. The only aptamers currently approved as therapeutic agents are chemically modified RNA aptamers, although DNA aptamers are inherently more nuclease-resistant than RNA aptamers. An RNA aptamer that binds to the Fc fragment of IgG1 and an RNA-DNA chimeric aptamer in which approximately half of the RNA is replaced by DNA have previously been reported, but their binding mechanisms have not yet been compared. In this study, we compared the binding mechanisms of these aptamers to the Fc fragment using isothermal titration calorimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. Although the RNA and chimeric aptamers exhibited similar binding affinities for the Fc fragment, the chimeric aptamer appeared to be more flexible than the RNA aptamer and to achieve a better fit to the Fc fragment, resulting in a larger enthalpy change. However, the flexibility of the chimeric aptamer led to a large entropy loss during interaction with the Fc fragment, which was compensated for by the large enthalpy change. Overall, these findings highlight a trade-off between flexibility-driven enthalpic gain and entropic cost, providing mechanistic insights into aptamer-protein recognition and a basis for rational aptamer design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6c00034
Primary Topic
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Nucleotide Flexibility on Aptamer–Protein Recognition: RNA vs RNA–DNA Chimera

Masahiro Sekiguchi, Takuya Hasegawa, Taiichi Sakamoto, Tomoki Sakamoto et al.
ACS Chemical Biology
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
article

Impact of Nucleotide Flexibility on Aptamer–Protein Recognition: RNA vs RNA–DNA Chimera

Masahiro Sekiguchi, Takuya Hasegawa, Taiichi Sakamoto, Tomoki Sakamoto, Takeshi Ishikawa, Takashi Nagata, Kenji Yamagishi, Masataka Horiuchi, Masato Katahira
article en

Abstract

Aptamers are single-stranded nucleic acid molecules that bind specifically and strongly to target molecules by adopting a unique tertiary structure that fits the target molecule. They have a wide range of biomedical applications, including disease treatment and diagnosis. Two types of aptamers exist: DNA aptamers and RNA aptamers. The only aptamers currently approved as therapeutic agents are chemically modified RNA aptamers, although DNA aptamers are inherently more nuclease-resistant than RNA aptamers. An RNA aptamer that binds to the Fc fragment of IgG1 and an RNA-DNA chimeric aptamer in which approximately half of the RNA is replaced by DNA have previously been reported, but their binding mechanisms have not yet been compared. In this study, we compared the binding mechanisms of these aptamers to the Fc fragment using isothermal titration calorimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. Although the RNA and chimeric aptamers exhibited similar binding affinities for the Fc fragment, the chimeric aptamer appeared to be more flexible than the RNA aptamer and to achieve a better fit to the Fc fragment, resulting in a larger enthalpy change. However, the flexibility of the chimeric aptamer led to a large entropy loss during interaction with the Fc fragment, which was compensated for by the large enthalpy change. Overall, these findings highlight a trade-off between flexibility-driven enthalpic gain and entropic cost, providing mechanistic insights into aptamer-protein recognition and a basis for rational aptamer design.

ACS Chemical Biology
Nihon University (JP), Kagoshima University (JP), Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences (JP), Health Sciences University of Hokkaido (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Institute of Chemical Industry of Forest Products (CN), Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics (BY), Chiba Institute of Technology (JP), Graduate School USA (US)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto University, Matching Planner Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.