A REVIEW OF DEACESSIONING POLICIES IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE ARCHIVES/SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

<p class="abstract" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: normal;">During the Spring semester of 2025 the author conducted a review of 23 deaccession policies from United States based university and college archives/special collections. The first study of its kind, the author wanted to know, of the policies that existed, what are their similarities and differences. Utilized the Society of American Archivists (SAA) <em>Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning</em>, the policies collected were examined for inclusion of authority/approval processes, methods of disposal, allowable uses of funds from sale if applicable, and how to manage found-in-collection objects. Any other similarities or differences of significance were noted. The author found that while most policies examined included some of the SAA&rsquo;s recommendations, few followed similar structures or emphasized the same deaccessioning guidelines. With a literature that backs deaccessioning as sound collections management practice, the policies examined show that ethical deaccessioning is possible, and the resources exist to help archives that are in the process of creating their own deaccession policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/34rk-rj75
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A REVIEW OF DEACESSIONING POLICIES IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE ARCHIVES/SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

Will Clemmons
UNC Libraries
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

A REVIEW OF DEACESSIONING POLICIES IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE ARCHIVES/SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

Will Clemmons
article en

Abstract

<p class="abstract" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: normal;">During the Spring semester of 2025 the author conducted a review of 23 deaccession policies from United States based university and college archives/special collections. The first study of its kind, the author wanted to know, of the policies that existed, what are their similarities and differences. Utilized the Society of American Archivists (SAA) <em>Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning</em>, the policies collected were examined for inclusion of authority/approval processes, methods of disposal, allowable uses of funds from sale if applicable, and how to manage found-in-collection objects. Any other similarities or differences of significance were noted. The author found that while most policies examined included some of the SAA&rsquo;s recommendations, few followed similar structures or emphasized the same deaccessioning guidelines. With a literature that backs deaccessioning as sound collections management practice, the policies examined show that ethical deaccessioning is possible, and the resources exist to help archives that are in the process of creating their own deaccession policy.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.