The Last Override: Why Human Authority has an Expiration Date and How to Extend It

The Last Override: Why Human Authority Has an Expiration Date and How to Extend It, argues that the central AI governance risk is not a dramatic “machine takeover,” but a gradual erosion of meaningful human authority as AI becomes embedded in critical infrastructure, financial systems, defense, healthcare, and public decision making. The paper introduces the concepts of the Velocity Gap and the Quiet Surrender to explain how institutions can lose practical control even while formal oversight remains in place. It proposes two governance mechanisms: the Control Capacity Index (CCI), a framework for measuring whether human oversight, auditability, and redundancy are keeping pace with system complexity and dependency; and the Compute Governance Stack, a layered approach to licensing, hardware tracking, cloud reporting, and allied enforcement. Written for government leaders, corproate executives, corporate boards, regulators, policymakers, and infrastructure operators, the paper offers a strategic framework and near term action agenda for preserving real human authority as AI becomes foundational to modern society.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19618285
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Last Override: Why Human Authority has an Expiration Date and How to Extend It

Alejandro Mainetto
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Last Override: Why Human Authority has an Expiration Date and How to Extend It

Alejandro Mainetto
article en

Abstract

The Last Override: Why Human Authority Has an Expiration Date and How to Extend It, argues that the central AI governance risk is not a dramatic “machine takeover,” but a gradual erosion of meaningful human authority as AI becomes embedded in critical infrastructure, financial systems, defense, healthcare, and public decision making. The paper introduces the concepts of the Velocity Gap and the Quiet Surrender to explain how institutions can lose practical control even while formal oversight remains in place. It proposes two governance mechanisms: the Control Capacity Index (CCI), a framework for measuring whether human oversight, auditability, and redundancy are keeping pace with system complexity and dependency; and the Compute Governance Stack, a layered approach to licensing, hardware tracking, cloud reporting, and allied enforcement. Written for government leaders, corproate executives, corporate boards, regulators, policymakers, and infrastructure operators, the paper offers a strategic framework and near term action agenda for preserving real human authority as AI becomes foundational to modern society.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.