Survey of Medical Trainee Perspectives on the Ethical and Religious Directives: Single University Experience

Background: The Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) guide the delivery of health care in Catholic hospitals across the United States. Purpose: This study seeks to understand the perceptions and experiences of medical trainees in a Catholic health care system on key ethical issues pertaining to the ERDs. Methods: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were recruited via email to complete a self-administered online survey on seven contemporary ethical issues: Catholic Healthcare Systems as Safety Nets; Contraception and Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Prevention; Gender-Affirming Care; Fertility; Maternal Endangerment and Pregnancy Termination; Elderly Care; and Brain Death and Organ Donation. Each student ranked the seven issues in order of priority and responded to further questions for the top three issues ranked. Free responses were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis with an interpretivist approach. Results: ; p = 0.011, respectively). In qualitative analysis, concern for patient welfare, navigation of value conflicts, and expression of uncertainty emerged across themes. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that medical students' ethical reasoning and experiences may be in tension with the ERDs. Recommendations include promotion of familiarity and alignment with the ERDs through the exploration of specific scenarios and exposure to ERD-coherent practices throughout medical training. Non-Technical Summary: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were surveyed for their opinions on seven contemporary issues related to the Ethical and Religious Directives, which guide Catholic healthcare provision in the United States. The issue of Maternal Endangerment and Pregnancy Termination was the most commonly chosen topic. An association between religion and selection of the topic of Contraception was detected. Free responses across topics demonstrated concern for patient welfare, navigation of value conflicts, and expressions of uncertainty. Short Summary: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were surveyed for their opinions on the Ethical and Religious Directives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Linacre Quarterly
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639261429396
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey of Medical Trainee Perspectives on the Ethical and Religious Directives: Single University Experience

Hannah Fleming, Kevin T. Fitzgerald, Alexandra Mauritsen, Alexa Mistichelli
The Linacre Quarterly
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Survey of Medical Trainee Perspectives on the Ethical and Religious Directives: Single University Experience

Hannah Fleming, Kevin T. Fitzgerald, Alexandra Mauritsen, Alexa Mistichelli
article en

Abstract

Background: The Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) guide the delivery of health care in Catholic hospitals across the United States. Purpose: This study seeks to understand the perceptions and experiences of medical trainees in a Catholic health care system on key ethical issues pertaining to the ERDs. Methods: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were recruited via email to complete a self-administered online survey on seven contemporary ethical issues: Catholic Healthcare Systems as Safety Nets; Contraception and Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Prevention; Gender-Affirming Care; Fertility; Maternal Endangerment and Pregnancy Termination; Elderly Care; and Brain Death and Organ Donation. Each student ranked the seven issues in order of priority and responded to further questions for the top three issues ranked. Free responses were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis with an interpretivist approach. Results: ; p = 0.011, respectively). In qualitative analysis, concern for patient welfare, navigation of value conflicts, and expression of uncertainty emerged across themes. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that medical students' ethical reasoning and experiences may be in tension with the ERDs. Recommendations include promotion of familiarity and alignment with the ERDs through the exploration of specific scenarios and exposure to ERD-coherent practices throughout medical training. Non-Technical Summary: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were surveyed for their opinions on seven contemporary issues related to the Ethical and Religious Directives, which guide Catholic healthcare provision in the United States. The issue of Maternal Endangerment and Pregnancy Termination was the most commonly chosen topic. An association between religion and selection of the topic of Contraception was detected. Free responses across topics demonstrated concern for patient welfare, navigation of value conflicts, and expressions of uncertainty. Short Summary: Medical students from a Jesuit Catholic university were surveyed for their opinions on the Ethical and Religious Directives.

The Linacre Quarterly
Creighton University (US), CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy (US)
Gender equality, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.