Intraoperative ultrasonography with intraoperative MRI confirmation in glioma surgery: Evaluating a combined resection strategy

Background: Various intraoperative imaging adjuncts help detect residual tumor and maximize the extent of resection (EOR) in glioma surgery. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IOMRI) and intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) are potent technologies used to guide resection. The primary objective of this study was to effectively combine these two modalities for glioma resection, compare them for residual tumor detection, and examine their respective advantages. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 2 years, and patients with glioma involving eloquent or near-eloquent regions were included. They underwent surgical resections guided by combining IOUS and IOMRI. IOUS was done preresection and also used to monitor resection. IOMRI was done at the end of the intended tumor resection. Basic patient characteristics, IOUS and IOMRI findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. The mean age was 39.47 ± 11.04 years; 41.2% of the tumors were insular gliomas, and 61.8% were high-grade gliomas (grade 3 or 4). The median EOR was 91.42% (80.47–99.44%), and the median residual tumor volume was 4.46 cc (0.22–8.30 cc). 29.4% (10/34) of patients underwent further resection after IOMRI, resulting in a 10% increase in median EOR; nine of these were insular gliomas. The estimates of the EOR on IOUS and IOMRI were concordant in 64.7% of cases and discordant in 35.3% of cases. IOUS had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100% to detect residual tumor compared to IOMRI. Conclusion: A combined strategy using IOUS for intraoperative guidance and IOMRI as final confirmation yielded favorable surgical outcomes. IOUS, although comparable to IOMRI in detecting residual tumor, IOMRI proved beneficial, especially in insular gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Neurology International
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_75_2026
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative ultrasonography with intraoperative MRI confirmation in glioma surgery: Evaluating a combined resection strategy

Alok Mohan Uppar, Madhusudhan Nagesh, Abhinith Shashidhar, Malla Bhaskara Rao et al.
Surgical Neurology International
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Intraoperative ultrasonography with intraoperative MRI confirmation in glioma surgery: Evaluating a combined resection strategy

Alok Mohan Uppar, Madhusudhan Nagesh, Abhinith Shashidhar, Malla Bhaskara Rao, Arvinda H. Ramalingaiah, Gaurav Tyagi, Harsh Deora, Arivazhagan Arimappagan
article en

Abstract

Background: Various intraoperative imaging adjuncts help detect residual tumor and maximize the extent of resection (EOR) in glioma surgery. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IOMRI) and intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) are potent technologies used to guide resection. The primary objective of this study was to effectively combine these two modalities for glioma resection, compare them for residual tumor detection, and examine their respective advantages. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 2 years, and patients with glioma involving eloquent or near-eloquent regions were included. They underwent surgical resections guided by combining IOUS and IOMRI. IOUS was done preresection and also used to monitor resection. IOMRI was done at the end of the intended tumor resection. Basic patient characteristics, IOUS and IOMRI findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. The mean age was 39.47 ± 11.04 years; 41.2% of the tumors were insular gliomas, and 61.8% were high-grade gliomas (grade 3 or 4). The median EOR was 91.42% (80.47–99.44%), and the median residual tumor volume was 4.46 cc (0.22–8.30 cc). 29.4% (10/34) of patients underwent further resection after IOMRI, resulting in a 10% increase in median EOR; nine of these were insular gliomas. The estimates of the EOR on IOUS and IOMRI were concordant in 64.7% of cases and discordant in 35.3% of cases. IOUS had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100% to detect residual tumor compared to IOMRI. Conclusion: A combined strategy using IOUS for intraoperative guidance and IOMRI as final confirmation yielded favorable surgical outcomes. IOUS, although comparable to IOMRI in detecting residual tumor, IOMRI proved beneficial, especially in insular gliomas.

Surgical Neurology InternationalVol. 17
Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals (IN), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.