A Factors–Responses–Consequences Framework for Assessing Wildlife Impacts of Uncrewed Aerial Systems: A Systematic Review

Uncrewed aerial systems (UASs) have diverse applications in natural environments, yet their deployment can inadvertently disturb wildlife. This PRISMA-guided systematic review synthesised 39 studies (2015–2025) encompassing birds, mammals, and marine taxa to identify UAS operational drivers of disturbance. We applied a Factors–Responses–Consequences (F–R–C) framework linking UAS operational characteristics, observed wildlife responses, and ecological consequences. Three patterns emerged: (i) Factors: Contextual and operational conditions such as flight altitude, noise, and approach direction interact with species-specific sensitivities to shape disturbance potential. (ii) Responses: Physiological measures (e.g., elevated heart rates) often reveal hidden stress not evident from behaviour alone. (iii) Consequences: Short-term effects may accumulate into long-term impacts on health, reproduction, and habitat use. These findings highlight the need for species- and context-specific flight envelopes rather than solely uniform altitude limits. By structuring existing evidence within the F–R–C framework, this synthesis provides a transferable foundation for UAS mission planning, drone development, operational decision-making, ethical practice, and environmental impact assessment in conservation and wildlife-management contexts. As all screening and data extraction were conducted by a single reviewer, the findings should be interpreted with appropriate caution pending independent validation.