Forest Conservation and Propaganda in Australia, Canada and New Zealand, 1900–1945

Over the last decades, the history of the conservation movements in Australia, Canada and New Zealand has portrayed them as elitist and scientific movements. This article sheds new light upon these movements by investigating how scientific foresters and conservationists, influenced by new notions of the political sway of the public, devoted significant attention to influence public opinion through propaganda, believing public support essential to the implementation of scientific forestry in a democracy. As this article shows, conservationists and state forest agencies published pamphlets, launched magazines, delivered lectures, and organised exhibitions, seeking to shape public opinion. However, witnessing how the depression threatened to curtail their long work, some conservationists abandoned the idea of the possibility of enacting far-reaching conservation policies under democratic governance, instead advocating for bestowing experts with dictatorial powers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and History
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/whpeh.63861480345914
Primary Topic
Australian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest Conservation and Propaganda in Australia, Canada and New Zealand, 1900–1945

Anton Sveding
Environment and History
Australian History and Society
article

Forest Conservation and Propaganda in Australia, Canada and New Zealand, 1900–1945

Anton Sveding
article en

Abstract

Over the last decades, the history of the conservation movements in Australia, Canada and New Zealand has portrayed them as elitist and scientific movements. This article sheds new light upon these movements by investigating how scientific foresters and conservationists, influenced by new notions of the political sway of the public, devoted significant attention to influence public opinion through propaganda, believing public support essential to the implementation of scientific forestry in a democracy. As this article shows, conservationists and state forest agencies published pamphlets, launched magazines, delivered lectures, and organised exhibitions, seeking to shape public opinion. However, witnessing how the depression threatened to curtail their long work, some conservationists abandoned the idea of the possibility of enacting far-reaching conservation policies under democratic governance, instead advocating for bestowing experts with dictatorial powers.

Environment and History
University of Agder (NO)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Australian History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.