COSMOLOGY OF TIME: a critical–propositional reading of the article Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid, by Everton Behenck, in confrontation

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Everton Behenck’s preprint Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva, the study investigates the extent to which Behenck’s Cosmology of Time may be read as a phenomenological and observationally oriented framework that resonates with, or diverges from, the modal ontology of TO. The paper argues that Behenck’s proposal is especially relevant because it reinterprets dark energy, baryonic matter, and dark matter as temporal roles within an irreversible informational cycle, thereby opening a productive dialogue with core TO themes such as objective memory, irreversibility, relational constitution, phenomenic elements, inducing effects, and the composition of the present by prior elements. At the same time, the article shows that the Cosmology of Time does not yet satisfy the stronger modal demands of the Theory of Objectivity, since it does not derive its categories from necessary axioms, nor does it solve the problem of the absolute genesis of the universe from a foundational logical-ontological standpoint. The article is structured as a full scientific study with abstract, complete sections, bibliography, and a final appendix in the style of TO. It situates the debate within the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology and empirical bridges, and a broader dialogue with modern physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science. The result is not a mere critique, but a constructive effort to clarify how Behenck’s framework may function as a derived physical-phenomenological layer, while TO remains the deeper modal architecture of objective reality. Authors’ note: this analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Cosmology of Time; Everton Behenck; dark energy; dark matter; baryonic matter; gravitational memory; wave function collapse; decoherence; Landauer principle; modal ontology; cosmology; phenomenic elements; inducing effects; cosmogonic theorem; philosophy of physics; foundations of cosmology; objective reality; irreversibility; informational cosmology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19634378
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COSMOLOGY OF TIME: a critical–propositional reading of the article Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid, by Everton Behenck, in confrontation

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

COSMOLOGY OF TIME: a critical–propositional reading of the article Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid, by Everton Behenck, in confrontation

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Everton Behenck’s preprint Dark Energy as Future, Wave Function Collapse as Present, Dark Matter as Past Gravitational Memory: A Testable Framework for DESI DR2 and Euclid in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva, the study investigates the extent to which Behenck’s Cosmology of Time may be read as a phenomenological and observationally oriented framework that resonates with, or diverges from, the modal ontology of TO. The paper argues that Behenck’s proposal is especially relevant because it reinterprets dark energy, baryonic matter, and dark matter as temporal roles within an irreversible informational cycle, thereby opening a productive dialogue with core TO themes such as objective memory, irreversibility, relational constitution, phenomenic elements, inducing effects, and the composition of the present by prior elements. At the same time, the article shows that the Cosmology of Time does not yet satisfy the stronger modal demands of the Theory of Objectivity, since it does not derive its categories from necessary axioms, nor does it solve the problem of the absolute genesis of the universe from a foundational logical-ontological standpoint. The article is structured as a full scientific study with abstract, complete sections, bibliography, and a final appendix in the style of TO. It situates the debate within the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology and empirical bridges, and a broader dialogue with modern physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science. The result is not a mere critique, but a constructive effort to clarify how Behenck’s framework may function as a derived physical-phenomenological layer, while TO remains the deeper modal architecture of objective reality. Authors’ note: this analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Cosmology of Time; Everton Behenck; dark energy; dark matter; baryonic matter; gravitational memory; wave function collapse; decoherence; Landauer principle; modal ontology; cosmology; phenomenic elements; inducing effects; cosmogonic theorem; philosophy of physics; foundations of cosmology; objective reality; irreversibility; informational cosmology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.