Predictors of clinical response to biologics in psoriasis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies have revolutionized psoriasis management, yet inter-individual response varies significantly and reliable predictors of complete skin clearance remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify prognostic predictors of biologic efficacy in patients with psoriasis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched four databases (from their inception to January 28, 2026). Studies were screened and data extracted per predefined criteria; quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and analyses were performed in Stata 15.0. RESULTS: Thirty studies (n = 13,902) were included. Negative predictors of clearance included older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.9, p = 0.002), and involvement of special areas (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89, p = 0.003). Conversely, a positive family history (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71, p < 0.001) emerged as a significant predictor associated with better outcomes. No significant associations were observed for other analysed variables. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, higher comorbidity burden, obesity, and special-site involvement are associated with poorer biologic response in psoriasis, whereas family history is associated with better outcomes. These readily available baseline factors facilitate phenotype-based risk stratification and may guide treatment selection in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.70462
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of clinical response to biologics in psoriasis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Lei Cao, Panyu Wu, Xuerui Mao
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Predictors of clinical response to biologics in psoriasis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Lei Cao, Panyu Wu, Xuerui Mao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies have revolutionized psoriasis management, yet inter-individual response varies significantly and reliable predictors of complete skin clearance remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify prognostic predictors of biologic efficacy in patients with psoriasis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We systematically searched four databases (from their inception to January 28, 2026). Studies were screened and data extracted per predefined criteria; quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and analyses were performed in Stata 15.0. RESULTS: Thirty studies (n = 13,902) were included. Negative predictors of clearance included older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.9, p = 0.002), and involvement of special areas (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89, p = 0.003). Conversely, a positive family history (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71, p < 0.001) emerged as a significant predictor associated with better outcomes. No significant associations were observed for other analysed variables. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, higher comorbidity burden, obesity, and special-site involvement are associated with poorer biologic response in psoriasis, whereas family history is associated with better outcomes. These readily available baseline factors facilitate phenotype-based risk stratification and may guide treatment selection in clinical practice.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Jiangnan University (CN), Wuxi People's Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.