Managing the ethical risks of AI in intelligence: a multi-layered framework

Abstract This article develops a context-sensitive multi-level harm–threat ethical framework for assessing the permissibility of artificial intelligence (AI) in intelligence operations, with particular focus on harms to privacy and autonomy. AI offers unprecedented capabilities in data collection, analysis, and predictive modeling, enabling more efficient and effective detection and prevention of threats. At the same time, its use in intelligence contexts intensifies the scale, depth, and persistence of intrusions, while reshaping how intelligence operatives understand their roles, judgements, and reliance on algorithmically generated information. The ethical challenge, therefore, is not whether intelligence-AI causes harm, but how such harm can be morally assessed, constrained, and justified throughout the process. This paper addresses this challenge by developing a multi-level harm–threat framework that evaluates ethical permissibility by systematically linking the degree of harm imposed to the severity, proximity, evidentiary strength, and target liability of the anticipated threat. Embedded within the intelligence cycle, the framework captures how AI-driven collection, processing, analysis, and implementation progressively intensify intrusion through profiling and prediction. The paper’s contribution lies in translating normative ethical reasoning into an operational justificatory logic that guides intelligence decision-making without normalizing ambient or disproportionate surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03045-2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing the ethical risks of AI in intelligence: a multi-layered framework

Ross Bellaby
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Managing the ethical risks of AI in intelligence: a multi-layered framework

Ross Bellaby
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article develops a context-sensitive multi-level harm–threat ethical framework for assessing the permissibility of artificial intelligence (AI) in intelligence operations, with particular focus on harms to privacy and autonomy. AI offers unprecedented capabilities in data collection, analysis, and predictive modeling, enabling more efficient and effective detection and prevention of threats. At the same time, its use in intelligence contexts intensifies the scale, depth, and persistence of intrusions, while reshaping how intelligence operatives understand their roles, judgements, and reliance on algorithmically generated information. The ethical challenge, therefore, is not whether intelligence-AI causes harm, but how such harm can be morally assessed, constrained, and justified throughout the process. This paper addresses this challenge by developing a multi-level harm–threat framework that evaluates ethical permissibility by systematically linking the degree of harm imposed to the severity, proximity, evidentiary strength, and target liability of the anticipated threat. Embedded within the intelligence cycle, the framework captures how AI-driven collection, processing, analysis, and implementation progressively intensify intrusion through profiling and prediction. The paper’s contribution lies in translating normative ethical reasoning into an operational justificatory logic that guides intelligence decision-making without normalizing ambient or disproportionate surveillance.

AI & Society
University of Sheffield (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.