Emerging adulthood and sentencing in Minnesota, 2016–2019: Focal concerns, developmental science, and judicial decision-making

Emerging adulthood (ages 18–25) represents a distinct developmental period marked by ongoing brain and psychosocial maturation, yet its influence on sentencing outcomes remains under-researched. Drawing on focal concerns theory and developmental neuroscience, this study uses Minnesota sentencing data from 2016 to 2019 to assess whether sentencing patterns for emerging adults align with expectations derived from developmental research. The results indicate that emerging adult status is not consistently treated as a mitigator in judicial decision-making. Instead, emerging adult offenders often receive longer sentences and harsher sanctions than older adults, suggesting that judges prioritize perceptions of future risk to the community and practical constraints over diminished culpability due to brain immaturity. The effect of emerging adulthood on sentencing practice is moderated by sex and offense type, but not by race. Findings highlight the need to formally and systematically integrate developmental neuroscience into sentencing practice, such as sentencing guideline provisions, departure rationales, risk assessment instruments, and judicial training. More systematic integration could promote more consistent, equitable, and evidence-based sentencing for emerging adult offenders, strengthening the connection between developmental research and criminal justice policy. • Emerging adults in Minnesota face higher likelihood of incarceration than older adults. • Offenders aged 21–25 get longer sentences and fewer mitigated departures than 18–21. • Age effects vary by offense type, strongest in drug cases and mixed for other offenses. • Race/ethnicity does not moderate age effects despite of adultification concerns. • Policy should embed developmental science in sentencing guidelines, risk tools, and judicial training. • Create guideline commentary linking emerging adult status to mitigator to standardize departure decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102658
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging adulthood and sentencing in Minnesota, 2016–2019: Focal concerns, developmental science, and judicial decision-making

Andrew Kuo, Yu Du
Journal of Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Emerging adulthood and sentencing in Minnesota, 2016–2019: Focal concerns, developmental science, and judicial decision-making

Andrew Kuo, Yu Du
article en

Abstract

Emerging adulthood (ages 18–25) represents a distinct developmental period marked by ongoing brain and psychosocial maturation, yet its influence on sentencing outcomes remains under-researched. Drawing on focal concerns theory and developmental neuroscience, this study uses Minnesota sentencing data from 2016 to 2019 to assess whether sentencing patterns for emerging adults align with expectations derived from developmental research. The results indicate that emerging adult status is not consistently treated as a mitigator in judicial decision-making. Instead, emerging adult offenders often receive longer sentences and harsher sanctions than older adults, suggesting that judges prioritize perceptions of future risk to the community and practical constraints over diminished culpability due to brain immaturity. The effect of emerging adulthood on sentencing practice is moderated by sex and offense type, but not by race. Findings highlight the need to formally and systematically integrate developmental neuroscience into sentencing practice, such as sentencing guideline provisions, departure rationales, risk assessment instruments, and judicial training. More systematic integration could promote more consistent, equitable, and evidence-based sentencing for emerging adult offenders, strengthening the connection between developmental research and criminal justice policy. • Emerging adults in Minnesota face higher likelihood of incarceration than older adults. • Offenders aged 21–25 get longer sentences and fewer mitigated departures than 18–21. • Age effects vary by offense type, strongest in drug cases and mixed for other offenses. • Race/ethnicity does not moderate age effects despite of adultification concerns. • Policy should embed developmental science in sentencing guidelines, risk tools, and judicial training. • Create guideline commentary linking emerging adult status to mitigator to standardize departure decisions.

Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 104
Florida State University (US), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.