Understanding participant engagement in green sport events through the PSCI framework: when fairness meets authenticity

Purpose This study examines how incentive effectiveness in green sport events depends on the alignment among structural design, symbolic meaning, and contextual capacity. It introduces the propositional set on configurational incentives (PSCI) to explain why identical incentive schemes yield different participation, satisfaction, and stewardship outcomes across community-based ecotourism contexts. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a multi-method investigation combining structural equation modeling (SEM), response surface analysis (RSA), and non-inferiority testing (NI–TOST) on survey data from 374 participants across Thailand's peri-urban green sport events. The analysis rigorously tested five core propositions within the CIF framework, examining complementarity effects, equivalence relationships, contextual moderation, directional asymmetries, and equifinality pathways. Findings Structural incentives influence outcomes primarily through mechanisms of perceived fairness and authenticity. Cross-dimensional congruence – specifically alignment between structural and symbolic attributes – significantly amplifies engagement and satisfaction outcomes. Critically, misalignment effects are asymmetric: symbolic deficits generate disproportionately larger outcome reductions than structural deficits. Community resource capacity functions as a contingency moderator, intensifying congruence effects under resource-constrained conditions. While symbolic meaning substantially amplifies outcomes, it demonstrates limited substitutability for structural incentives, indicating complementary rather than interchangeable effects. Research limitations/implications Cross-sectional data limit causal inference; longitudinal replication is recommended to validate temporal stability. Practical implications Event managers should design incentives that transparently balance participant and community benefits, embed authenticity cues, and assess community capacity before implementation. Originality/value The study advances causal reasoning in sustainable event management by integrating symbolic interpretation and contextual readiness into a geometry-based model of incentive alignment. PSCI provides an auditable reasoning framework for analyzing complex socio-behavioral systems where outcomes depend on multi-dimensional congruence rather than linear causality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ABAC Journal
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/abac-10-2025-0215
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding participant engagement in green sport events through the PSCI framework: when fairness meets authenticity

Prarawan Senachai, Noppadol Manosuthi
ABAC Journal
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Understanding participant engagement in green sport events through the PSCI framework: when fairness meets authenticity

Prarawan Senachai, Noppadol Manosuthi
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how incentive effectiveness in green sport events depends on the alignment among structural design, symbolic meaning, and contextual capacity. It introduces the propositional set on configurational incentives (PSCI) to explain why identical incentive schemes yield different participation, satisfaction, and stewardship outcomes across community-based ecotourism contexts. Design/methodology/approach We conducted a multi-method investigation combining structural equation modeling (SEM), response surface analysis (RSA), and non-inferiority testing (NI–TOST) on survey data from 374 participants across Thailand's peri-urban green sport events. The analysis rigorously tested five core propositions within the CIF framework, examining complementarity effects, equivalence relationships, contextual moderation, directional asymmetries, and equifinality pathways. Findings Structural incentives influence outcomes primarily through mechanisms of perceived fairness and authenticity. Cross-dimensional congruence – specifically alignment between structural and symbolic attributes – significantly amplifies engagement and satisfaction outcomes. Critically, misalignment effects are asymmetric: symbolic deficits generate disproportionately larger outcome reductions than structural deficits. Community resource capacity functions as a contingency moderator, intensifying congruence effects under resource-constrained conditions. While symbolic meaning substantially amplifies outcomes, it demonstrates limited substitutability for structural incentives, indicating complementary rather than interchangeable effects. Research limitations/implications Cross-sectional data limit causal inference; longitudinal replication is recommended to validate temporal stability. Practical implications Event managers should design incentives that transparently balance participant and community benefits, embed authenticity cues, and assess community capacity before implementation. Originality/value The study advances causal reasoning in sustainable event management by integrating symbolic interpretation and contextual readiness into a geometry-based model of incentive alignment. PSCI provides an auditable reasoning framework for analyzing complex socio-behavioral systems where outcomes depend on multi-dimensional congruence rather than linear causality.

ABAC Journal
Chulalongkorn University (TH), Khon Kaen University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.