Decent work threatened: A review of reviews on gender-related violence and harassment in healthcare

<ns3:p>Background Workplace violence and harassment in the healthcare sector are prevalent phenomena that undermine decent work. However, the role of gender remains unclear and lacks conceptual consensus. This review of reviews synthesised evidence on workplace violence and harassment through a gender-sensitive lens, foregrounding gender-related mechanisms in healthcare workplaces to clarify concepts, map antecedents and consequences, appraise instruments, theoretical frameworks, and interventions, and inform policy and practice. Methods The systematic search was conducted in indexing databases (EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed reviews published in English within the last five years. Of the 1,439 initial records, 102 reviews were selected for inclusion. Content analysis was supported by a large language model (NotebookLM) to aid in data synthesis. Results Gender-related violence and harassment are inconsistently defined and operationalised, weakening comparability and prevalence estimation. Nurses and physicians are most frequently targeted, not only by patients/visitors but also co-workers/supervisors, evidencing both horizontal and vertical violence. Gender differences were found regarding types of violence: women are more frequently victims of verbal violence and men of physical violence. Consequences for the victims are severe, such as turnover, psychological distress, impaired care quality, and substantial organisational costs. Perpetrators suffer virtually no consequences and are not accountable. Assessment of the phenomenon is highly heterogeneous, with a heavy reliance on self-report and insufficient awareness of the influence of gender and culture. Current interventions focus on secondary outcomes, such as enhancing staff coping skills, rather than on prevention. Conclusion Violence and harassment in healthcare are common, multilevel, and gendered, but hampered by definitional ambiguity, with weak measurement, and a lack of a unifying theoretical framework. Standardised, gender and culturally informed definitions and instruments, rigorous outcome-focused evaluation of multicomponent interventions are needed and can contribute to building violence- and harassment-free healthcare workplaces.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.22945.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decent work threatened: A review of reviews on gender-related violence and harassment in healthcare

João Viseu, Leonor Pais, Carina Dantas, Cecilia Fazio et al.
1 citations
Open Research Europe
Workplace Violence and Bullying
43.50
article

Decent work threatened: A review of reviews on gender-related violence and harassment in healthcare

João Viseu, Leonor Pais, Carina Dantas, Cecilia Fazio, Nuno Rebelo dos Santos, Simona Gaudi, Inés Rey Hidalgo, Pelayo Quirós, Marco Giustini, Rita Berger, Carla Semedo, Natália Machado, Anabela Pereira, Anna Carannante, Héctor Muñiz Sierra, Jan Philipp Czakert, Inês Saavedra, Ana Sofia Menício, Inês Agostinho, Paola Bello, Soraia Oliveira, S M F Lopes, Diogo Cerdeira, Ana C. Vieira, Léon-Paul Schaub Torre, Margarida Farinha, Šefik Salkunić, Carla Carvalho, Maja Molan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Workplace violence and harassment in the healthcare sector are prevalent phenomena that undermine decent work. However, the role of gender remains unclear and lacks conceptual consensus. This review of reviews synthesised evidence on workplace violence and harassment through a gender-sensitive lens, foregrounding gender-related mechanisms in healthcare workplaces to clarify concepts, map antecedents and consequences, appraise instruments, theoretical frameworks, and interventions, and inform policy and practice. Methods The systematic search was conducted in indexing databases (EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed reviews published in English within the last five years. Of the 1,439 initial records, 102 reviews were selected for inclusion. Content analysis was supported by a large language model (NotebookLM) to aid in data synthesis. Results Gender-related violence and harassment are inconsistently defined and operationalised, weakening comparability and prevalence estimation. Nurses and physicians are most frequently targeted, not only by patients/visitors but also co-workers/supervisors, evidencing both horizontal and vertical violence. Gender differences were found regarding types of violence: women are more frequently victims of verbal violence and men of physical violence. Consequences for the victims are severe, such as turnover, psychological distress, impaired care quality, and substantial organisational costs. Perpetrators suffer virtually no consequences and are not accountable. Assessment of the phenomenon is highly heterogeneous, with a heavy reliance on self-report and insufficient awareness of the influence of gender and culture. Current interventions focus on secondary outcomes, such as enhancing staff coping skills, rather than on prevention. Conclusion Violence and harassment in healthcare are common, multilevel, and gendered, but hampered by definitional ambiguity, with weak measurement, and a lack of a unifying theoretical framework. Standardised, gender and culturally informed definitions and instruments, rigorous outcome-focused evaluation of multicomponent interventions are needed and can contribute to building violence- and harassment-free healthcare workplaces.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 6
University of Évora (PT), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (ES), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), Fundación Centro Tecnológico de la Información y la Comunicación (ES), University Clinical Centre Maribor (SI), Shine Micro (United States) (US), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), University of Coimbra (PT)
Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
43.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.