Loneliness within couples coping with cancer: prevalence, associations with physical and mental health, and potential benefits of dyadic exercise

Introduction: Cancer survivors and intimate care partners coping with cancer may each experience loneliness that impacts their health, but research within couples and potential benefit of interventions is scarce. METHODS: We added the Cancer Loneliness (CL) scale to measures of anxiety, depressive symptoms, pain and social and physical function mid-way through the Exercising Together trial (NCT03630354) in couples coping with breast (BC; n = 44) or prostate cancer (PC; n = 75). The prevalence of CL scores >1 indicated at least some loneliness and we ran correlations between CL and measures of social, physical and mental health. Within PC couples we explored the potential benefits of different types of dyadic exercise programs (supervised, group partnered exercise, supervised separate groups of survivors or partners, or unsupervised independent exercise) on CL over 6 months. Results: 96% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and 77% of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) reported CL at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.44, 0.77), depressive symptoms (rho = 0.60, 0.67) and pain (rho = 0.34, 0.23) and inversely associated with social functioning (rho = -0.54, -0.55) among BCS and PCS, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with physical functioning in BCS (rho = -0.35), but not PCS. Among care partners, 74%-77% of care partners for each BCS and PCS reported CL related to their partner's cancer at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.43, 0.30) and depressive symptoms (rho = 0.62, 0.45) among BC and PC care partners, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with social functioning in BC partners only (rho = -0.45, p < 0.01), but not with physical functioning in either group. Within PC couples, there was a significant (inverse) interaction between change in CL over six-months of exercise and baseline loneliness. Declines in CL for both PCS and care partners were steepest in the exercise program where they trained with other PCS or care partners. Conclusion: Relationships may not offer enough social support to avoid feelings of loneliness associated with cancer that in turn affects the physical, emotional and social health of each partner. However, exercise may help rebuild connection within the couple and be an avenue for informal social support that together could reduce loneliness. Clinical Trial Registration: [clinicaltrials.gov]: identifier, [NCT03630354].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Aging
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2026.1812899
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loneliness within couples coping with cancer: prevalence, associations with physical and mental health, and potential benefits of dyadic exercise

Nathan F. Dieckmann, Shirlene Wang, Julie N. Graff, Sydnee Stoyles et al.
Frontiers in Aging
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Loneliness within couples coping with cancer: prevalence, associations with physical and mental health, and potential benefits of dyadic exercise

Nathan F. Dieckmann, Shirlene Wang, Julie N. Graff, Sydnee Stoyles, Arthur Hung, Alexandra O. Sokolova, Kerri Winters‐Stone, Karen S. Lyons
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer survivors and intimate care partners coping with cancer may each experience loneliness that impacts their health, but research within couples and potential benefit of interventions is scarce. METHODS: We added the Cancer Loneliness (CL) scale to measures of anxiety, depressive symptoms, pain and social and physical function mid-way through the Exercising Together trial (NCT03630354) in couples coping with breast (BC; n = 44) or prostate cancer (PC; n = 75). The prevalence of CL scores >1 indicated at least some loneliness and we ran correlations between CL and measures of social, physical and mental health. Within PC couples we explored the potential benefits of different types of dyadic exercise programs (supervised, group partnered exercise, supervised separate groups of survivors or partners, or unsupervised independent exercise) on CL over 6 months. Results: 96% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and 77% of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) reported CL at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.44, 0.77), depressive symptoms (rho = 0.60, 0.67) and pain (rho = 0.34, 0.23) and inversely associated with social functioning (rho = -0.54, -0.55) among BCS and PCS, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with physical functioning in BCS (rho = -0.35), but not PCS. Among care partners, 74%-77% of care partners for each BCS and PCS reported CL related to their partner's cancer at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.43, 0.30) and depressive symptoms (rho = 0.62, 0.45) among BC and PC care partners, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with social functioning in BC partners only (rho = -0.45, p < 0.01), but not with physical functioning in either group. Within PC couples, there was a significant (inverse) interaction between change in CL over six-months of exercise and baseline loneliness. Declines in CL for both PCS and care partners were steepest in the exercise program where they trained with other PCS or care partners. Conclusion: Relationships may not offer enough social support to avoid feelings of loneliness associated with cancer that in turn affects the physical, emotional and social health of each partner. However, exercise may help rebuild connection within the couple and be an avenue for informal social support that together could reduce loneliness. Clinical Trial Registration: [clinicaltrials.gov]: identifier, [NCT03630354].

Frontiers in AgingVol. 7
Boston College (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Angiologica (Italy) (IT)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.