Comparing the effect of dispositional and contextual ethical sensitivity in ethical decision-making of medical students: A cross-sectional study

As awareness of medical ethics is the first step in the successful implementation of ethical decision-making, the importance of ethical sensitivity has been frequently highlighted. This study aimed to explore the different influencing mechanisms of dispositional and contextual ethical sensitivity (CES) in medical students' ethical decision-making. Based on Rest's four-stage ethical decision-making model, this research highlights the importance of ethical sensitivity in ethical decision-making. Using the Credamo platform, we generated a questionnaire link and randomly selected 678 medical students from 3 cities in China as our research sample. We constructed a mediation model for a comparative study to analyze the mediating roles of ethical judgment in the relationship between dispositional ethical sensitivity/CES and ethical intention. The results showed that medical students' dispositional ethical sensitivity positively affects their ethical intentions, and CES negatively affects their ethical intentions; the relationship between dispositional/CES and ethical intention is mediated by ethical judgment. Our research indicates that medical schools ought to implement a variety of strategies to enhance the ethical sensitivity of their students, thereby improving their capacity to make ethical decisions. These findings hold important implications for the progression of medical ethics education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048333
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effect of dispositional and contextual ethical sensitivity in ethical decision-making of medical students: A cross-sectional study

Xiang Sun, Zhen Xu, Na Zhang, Qi Wang
Medicine
Ethics in medical practice
article

Comparing the effect of dispositional and contextual ethical sensitivity in ethical decision-making of medical students: A cross-sectional study

Xiang Sun, Zhen Xu, Na Zhang, Qi Wang
article en

Abstract

As awareness of medical ethics is the first step in the successful implementation of ethical decision-making, the importance of ethical sensitivity has been frequently highlighted. This study aimed to explore the different influencing mechanisms of dispositional and contextual ethical sensitivity (CES) in medical students' ethical decision-making. Based on Rest's four-stage ethical decision-making model, this research highlights the importance of ethical sensitivity in ethical decision-making. Using the Credamo platform, we generated a questionnaire link and randomly selected 678 medical students from 3 cities in China as our research sample. We constructed a mediation model for a comparative study to analyze the mediating roles of ethical judgment in the relationship between dispositional ethical sensitivity/CES and ethical intention. The results showed that medical students' dispositional ethical sensitivity positively affects their ethical intentions, and CES negatively affects their ethical intentions; the relationship between dispositional/CES and ethical intention is mediated by ethical judgment. Our research indicates that medical schools ought to implement a variety of strategies to enhance the ethical sensitivity of their students, thereby improving their capacity to make ethical decisions. These findings hold important implications for the progression of medical ethics education.

MedicineVol. 105(16)
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Beijing Technology and Business University (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.