Methodological Specification for the Mimicry Index (MI-1.0): Quantifying Expressive Distortion in Algorithmic Habitats

This methodological specification introduces the Mimicry Index (MI-1.0), a longitudinal framework designed to quantify "Expressive Distortion" within digitally governed environments. While traditional platform metrics (views, engagement) prioritize system performance, the MI-1.0 focuses on the psychological impact of algorithmic governance: the systematic convergence of individual behavior toward platform-favored norms. Grounded in the Expressive Space Framework and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the model operationalizes the "autonomy-in-relatedness paradox" (Kluwer et al., 2020). The index utilizes a multi-dimensional protocol to calculate the statistical distance between a creator’s unique historical baseline and their post-catalyst output across four pillars:

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19635009
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Specification for the Mimicry Index (MI-1.0): Quantifying Expressive Distortion in Algorithmic Habitats

J. Matthew Pierce
Open MIND
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Methodological Specification for the Mimicry Index (MI-1.0): Quantifying Expressive Distortion in Algorithmic Habitats

J. Matthew Pierce
article en

Abstract

This methodological specification introduces the Mimicry Index (MI-1.0), a longitudinal framework designed to quantify "Expressive Distortion" within digitally governed environments. While traditional platform metrics (views, engagement) prioritize system performance, the MI-1.0 focuses on the psychological impact of algorithmic governance: the systematic convergence of individual behavior toward platform-favored norms. Grounded in the Expressive Space Framework and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the model operationalizes the "autonomy-in-relatedness paradox" (Kluwer et al., 2020). The index utilizes a multi-dimensional protocol to calculate the statistical distance between a creator’s unique historical baseline and their post-catalyst output across four pillars:

Open MIND
Ottawa University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.