A novel nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as an objective indicator of nasal obstruction

Objective: To introduce and clinically validate, for the first time, a novel nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as an objective metric for assessing nasal obstruction. This ratio is designed to capture compensatory breathing patterns and to improve correlation with subjective symptoms compared with existing assessment methods. Methods: A total of 108 patients with self-reported nasal obstruction and 26 healthy controls were enrolled. A custom-designed face mask equipped with pressure sensors recorded nasal airflow pressure during quiet breathing and oral airflow pressure during forced oral breathing. The nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio was calculated and correlated with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for nasal obstruction using Spearman's correlation. Sex-specific subgroup analyses were performed. Results: < 0.001), outperforming traditional metrics for assessing nasal obstruction. Sex-specific analyses revealed consistent trends in both males and females, with a slightly stronger correlation in female patients. Conclusion: This study provides the first clinical validation of the nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as a sensitive, practical, and objective indicator of nasal obstruction. By incorporating compensatory oral breathing dynamics, the ratio bridges the gap between subjective sensation and traditional objective measurements, offering a low-cost, easy-to-deploy tool for broad clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Allergy
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2026.1807126
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as an objective indicator of nasal obstruction

Xindi Yang, Caifeng Xia, Minghui Wang, Shiqi Wang et al.
Frontiers in Allergy
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

A novel nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as an objective indicator of nasal obstruction

Xindi Yang, Caifeng Xia, Minghui Wang, Shiqi Wang, Yuntian Bao, Yusong Dai, Baoshi Fan, Wendong Liu, Yu Song
article en

Abstract

Objective: To introduce and clinically validate, for the first time, a novel nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as an objective metric for assessing nasal obstruction. This ratio is designed to capture compensatory breathing patterns and to improve correlation with subjective symptoms compared with existing assessment methods. Methods: A total of 108 patients with self-reported nasal obstruction and 26 healthy controls were enrolled. A custom-designed face mask equipped with pressure sensors recorded nasal airflow pressure during quiet breathing and oral airflow pressure during forced oral breathing. The nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio was calculated and correlated with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for nasal obstruction using Spearman's correlation. Sex-specific subgroup analyses were performed. Results: < 0.001), outperforming traditional metrics for assessing nasal obstruction. Sex-specific analyses revealed consistent trends in both males and females, with a slightly stronger correlation in female patients. Conclusion: This study provides the first clinical validation of the nasal-to-oral airflow pressure ratio as a sensitive, practical, and objective indicator of nasal obstruction. By incorporating compensatory oral breathing dynamics, the ratio bridges the gap between subjective sensation and traditional objective measurements, offering a low-cost, easy-to-deploy tool for broad clinical use.

Frontiers in AllergyVol. 7
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.