Coworking Spaces and Alienation

This article investigates coworking spaces as ambivalent infrastructures within the landscape of digital capitalism. Through a qualitative case study of Fabbriche Binarie and Sugar Paper in Modena, Italy, it explores how these spaces mediate experiences of alienation, spatial disconnection, and social recognition. Drawing on theories of alienation (Rosa, 2013, 2019) and recognition (Honneth, 2014), the study identifies three interrelated forms of estrangement (temporal, spatial, and relational) amplified by remote work. While coworking is promoted as a flexible and inclusive alternative to traditional offices, the findings reveal underlying contradictions: symbolic over-coding, weak social ties, and selective inclusion. The paper argues that coworking hubs can either reproduce or resist forms of alienation depending on their governance and integration into the urban fabric. Ultimately, it calls for a rethinking of such spaces as civic infrastructures, capable of fostering democratic presence, spatial justice, and social resonance in an increasingly fragmented work environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/6.1.3
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coworking Spaces and Alienation

Carlo Montalvo, Anna Maria Casali, Eugenio Capitani, Camelia Sciortino
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Coworking Spaces and Alienation

Carlo Montalvo, Anna Maria Casali, Eugenio Capitani, Camelia Sciortino
article en

Abstract

This article investigates coworking spaces as ambivalent infrastructures within the landscape of digital capitalism. Through a qualitative case study of Fabbriche Binarie and Sugar Paper in Modena, Italy, it explores how these spaces mediate experiences of alienation, spatial disconnection, and social recognition. Drawing on theories of alienation (Rosa, 2013, 2019) and recognition (Honneth, 2014), the study identifies three interrelated forms of estrangement (temporal, spatial, and relational) amplified by remote work. While coworking is promoted as a flexible and inclusive alternative to traditional offices, the findings reveal underlying contradictions: symbolic over-coding, weak social ties, and selective inclusion. The paper argues that coworking hubs can either reproduce or resist forms of alienation depending on their governance and integration into the urban fabric. Ultimately, it calls for a rethinking of such spaces as civic infrastructures, capable of fostering democratic presence, spatial justice, and social resonance in an increasingly fragmented work environment.

DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coworking Spaces and Alienation — Carlo Montalvo, Anna Maria Casali, et al. · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS