Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage and/or stamp cytology: An exploratory phase II study

BACKGROUND: Our group revealed that the combination of intra-operative stamp cytology and peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) improved the identification of individuals with high risk of peritoneal metastasis. In this exploratory Phase II study, we aimed to evaluate the effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) and/or stamp cytology positive (stamp+). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single arm, multi-institutional, exploratory phase 2 trial to assess the effects of EIPL after open gastrectomy for gastric cancer with CY1 and/ or stamp+. The primary endpoint was RFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), postoperative recurrence site and incidence of postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 13 patients from 2 institutions were enrolled in this study. Because of the recent decline in open abdominal surgery, the number of cases did not increase and the trial was closed due to lack of applicants at 13 cases. Median 3-year RFS was 14.5 months (95% CI 5.4-NA), median 3-year OS was not reached (95% CI 14.5-NA) and median3-year peritoneal RFS was 16.0 months (95% CI 5.4-NA). Median 3-year peritoneal RFS rate was 83% in CY0 and stamp+ cases (n=6), and 0% in CY1 and stamp+/- cases (n=7). (Log-rank p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Because of the slow accrual pace and early stop of the trial, we were not able to evaluate the prespecified endpoints thoroughly. However, EIPL might be effective to prevent perineal recurrence, especially in CY0 and stamp+ case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347742
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage and/or stamp cytology: An exploratory phase II study

Gen Tsujio, Katsunobu Sakurai, Kohei Matsuoka, Yuichiro Miki et al.
PLoS ONE
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage and/or stamp cytology: An exploratory phase II study

Gen Tsujio, Katsunobu Sakurai, Kohei Matsuoka, Yuichiro Miki, Naoshi Kubo, Go Masuda, Masaichi Ohira, Koji Maruo, Tomohisa Okuno, Tatsuro Tamura, Mami Yoshii, Takahiro Toyokawa, Masakazu Yashiro, Kiyoshi Maeda, Shigeru Lee, Kishu Kitayama
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our group revealed that the combination of intra-operative stamp cytology and peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) improved the identification of individuals with high risk of peritoneal metastasis. In this exploratory Phase II study, we aimed to evaluate the effect on relapse-free survival (RFS) of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology (CY1) and/or stamp cytology positive (stamp+). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single arm, multi-institutional, exploratory phase 2 trial to assess the effects of EIPL after open gastrectomy for gastric cancer with CY1 and/ or stamp+. The primary endpoint was RFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), postoperative recurrence site and incidence of postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 13 patients from 2 institutions were enrolled in this study. Because of the recent decline in open abdominal surgery, the number of cases did not increase and the trial was closed due to lack of applicants at 13 cases. Median 3-year RFS was 14.5 months (95% CI 5.4-NA), median 3-year OS was not reached (95% CI 14.5-NA) and median3-year peritoneal RFS was 16.0 months (95% CI 5.4-NA). Median 3-year peritoneal RFS rate was 83% in CY0 and stamp+ cases (n=6), and 0% in CY1 and stamp+/- cases (n=7). (Log-rank p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Because of the slow accrual pace and early stop of the trial, we were not able to evaluate the prespecified endpoints thoroughly. However, EIPL might be effective to prevent perineal recurrence, especially in CY0 and stamp+ case.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Osaka Metropolitan University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.