What Happens After the Signal: The Missing Layer in AI-Supported Decision-Making

This paper defines a critical and previously unstructured domain within AI-supported justice environments: the execution-layer decision space. While existing governance frameworks focus on system design, validation, and outcome monitoring, they do not address how decisions are actually formed between the moment a system generates a signal and the moment institutional authority is exercised. This work introduces the concept of Decision Observability as a structured approach to making decision-making visible at the point where human judgment interacts with system outputs. It establishes the execution-layer decision space as a distinct and necessary layer of governance, with implications for accountability, defensibility, and operational improvement across corrections, courts, and supervision environments. This paper is part of the Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) Canon Series (JDO-2026), a structured body of work defining the field of execution-layer governance in AI-supported systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19633957
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Happens After the Signal: The Missing Layer in AI-Supported Decision-Making

Stephanie Fleming, Janna M. Broaddus
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

What Happens After the Signal: The Missing Layer in AI-Supported Decision-Making

Stephanie Fleming, Janna M. Broaddus
article en

Abstract

This paper defines a critical and previously unstructured domain within AI-supported justice environments: the execution-layer decision space. While existing governance frameworks focus on system design, validation, and outcome monitoring, they do not address how decisions are actually formed between the moment a system generates a signal and the moment institutional authority is exercised. This work introduces the concept of Decision Observability as a structured approach to making decision-making visible at the point where human judgment interacts with system outputs. It establishes the execution-layer decision space as a distinct and necessary layer of governance, with implications for accountability, defensibility, and operational improvement across corrections, courts, and supervision environments. This paper is part of the Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) Canon Series (JDO-2026), a structured body of work defining the field of execution-layer governance in AI-supported systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
United States Department of Justice (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.