Who Is (Not) Afraid of Immigration? A Mediation Analysis Into the Ambivalence of Christian Religiosity for Immigration‐Related Attitudes

ABSTRACT This article systematically investigates the mediators linking Christian religiosity to immigration‐related attitudes in Germany. On the basis of current, representative data (ALLBUS 2023), four mediation models reveal multiple pathways through which religiosity shapes such attitudes. These pathways correspond to three distinct functions of religion: economic, value‐based, and social. Specifically, religious optimism mitigates perceptions of economic conflict over immigration. Nonfundamentalist religiosity encourages pro‐immigration attitudes through concern for diversity, tolerance, and prosociality. In addition, outgroup contact, encouraged by nonfundamentalist religiosity, reduces cultural distancing from immigrant groups. In contrast, religious fundamentalism reinforces social and cultural distancing. By identifying new mediators and refining the modeling of established ones, the study advances our understanding of the complex and ambivalent significance of Christian religiosity in shaping immigration‐related attitudes. The mediators examined reflect fundamental functions of religion that extend beyond the German context, suggesting that the proposed model has broader international relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70061
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Is (Not) Afraid of Immigration? A Mediation Analysis Into the Ambivalence of Christian Religiosity for Immigration‐Related Attitudes

Felix Roleder
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Who Is (Not) Afraid of Immigration? A Mediation Analysis Into the Ambivalence of Christian Religiosity for Immigration‐Related Attitudes

Felix Roleder
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article systematically investigates the mediators linking Christian religiosity to immigration‐related attitudes in Germany. On the basis of current, representative data (ALLBUS 2023), four mediation models reveal multiple pathways through which religiosity shapes such attitudes. These pathways correspond to three distinct functions of religion: economic, value‐based, and social. Specifically, religious optimism mitigates perceptions of economic conflict over immigration. Nonfundamentalist religiosity encourages pro‐immigration attitudes through concern for diversity, tolerance, and prosociality. In addition, outgroup contact, encouraged by nonfundamentalist religiosity, reduces cultural distancing from immigrant groups. In contrast, religious fundamentalism reinforces social and cultural distancing. By identifying new mediators and refining the modeling of established ones, the study advances our understanding of the complex and ambivalent significance of Christian religiosity in shaping immigration‐related attitudes. The mediators examined reflect fundamental functions of religion that extend beyond the German context, suggesting that the proposed model has broader international relevance.

Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.