Pressure injury severity and trajectory: A 5-year cohort study in an Australian health district

AIM: To investigate outcomes of severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries including Stage 3, Stage 4, Unstageable and Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries and examine wound trajectories, patient characteristics and patterns of wound progression over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 5-year cohort of hospitalised patients with severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries reported across four Australian hospitals (December 2019-November 2024). Data from a purpose-built database were entered in by Skin Integrity Leads (senior wound nurses), with wounds assessed at initial reporting, specialist review, monitoring and discharge. Associations between clinical variables and injury severity were examined using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among 388 patients (mean age 72.2 years; 63.7% male), heels were the most common injury site (53.4%). The majority of wounds were confirmed as severe at initial review. Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries were more likely to receive timely review (83.5%). By discharge, a number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries had resolved or were reclassified as non-severe. Factors significantly associated with severe pressure injuries included orthopaedic fractures (p = 0.034), age-related factors (p = 0.019), musculoskeletal diagnoses (p = 0.010), renal/urological comorbidities (p = 0.006), and aged/complex care specialties (p = 0.004). Mean hospital stay was 55.9 days. CONCLUSION: Older age, comorbidities, reduced mobility, and specialised care highlight high-risk groups for pressure injury risk. A number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries stabilised or resolved with timely assessment. These findings challenge assumptions that Suspected Deep Tissue Injury routinely indicate inevitable deep tissue damage, and reinforce that many severe pressure injuries are preventable. Early recognition can improve outcomes and inform prevention strategies, clinical practice, and resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tissue Viability
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2026.101000
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure injury severity and trajectory: A 5-year cohort study in an Australian health district

Michelle Barakat‐Johnson, John Stephenson, Michelle Lai, Natalie Ko et al.
Journal of Tissue Viability
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Pressure injury severity and trajectory: A 5-year cohort study in an Australian health district

Michelle Barakat‐Johnson, John Stephenson, Michelle Lai, Natalie Ko, Katja Heuer, Darren Dela Rosa, Apryl Repole
article en

Abstract

AIM: To investigate outcomes of severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries including Stage 3, Stage 4, Unstageable and Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries and examine wound trajectories, patient characteristics and patterns of wound progression over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a 5-year cohort of hospitalised patients with severe hospital-acquired pressure injuries reported across four Australian hospitals (December 2019-November 2024). Data from a purpose-built database were entered in by Skin Integrity Leads (senior wound nurses), with wounds assessed at initial reporting, specialist review, monitoring and discharge. Associations between clinical variables and injury severity were examined using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among 388 patients (mean age 72.2 years; 63.7% male), heels were the most common injury site (53.4%). The majority of wounds were confirmed as severe at initial review. Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries were more likely to receive timely review (83.5%). By discharge, a number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries had resolved or were reclassified as non-severe. Factors significantly associated with severe pressure injuries included orthopaedic fractures (p = 0.034), age-related factors (p = 0.019), musculoskeletal diagnoses (p = 0.010), renal/urological comorbidities (p = 0.006), and aged/complex care specialties (p = 0.004). Mean hospital stay was 55.9 days. CONCLUSION: Older age, comorbidities, reduced mobility, and specialised care highlight high-risk groups for pressure injury risk. A number of Suspected Deep Tissue Injuries stabilised or resolved with timely assessment. These findings challenge assumptions that Suspected Deep Tissue Injury routinely indicate inevitable deep tissue damage, and reinforce that many severe pressure injuries are preventable. Early recognition can improve outcomes and inform prevention strategies, clinical practice, and resource allocation.

Journal of Tissue ViabilityVol. 35(3)
New South Wales Department of Health (AU), University of Huddersfield (GB), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.