Comparative outcomes of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy for solitary mid and lower ureteric stones

INTRODUCTION: The management of ureteric stones has been revolutionized by minimally invasive techniques, with Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) and pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) being two primary modalities. While effective, they differ in mechanism, cost, and potential complications. This study aims to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of LL versus PL for solitary mid and lower ureteric stones. METHODS: < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: = 0.02). The incidence of other complications was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both modalities are effective for managing ureteric stones. However, LL is superior in preventing stone retropulsion and leading to a shorter hospital stay. The choice of lithotripsy depends on available resources, stone characteristics, and surgical expertise.