Structural basis of chaperone mechanisms in cells and the evolutionary emergence of the protein world

How chaperones mediate protein folding in the crowded cell environment remains poorly understood. To gain insight, we developed CHAP-SEQ to examine how chaperones affect protein folding in cells at high throughput and amino acid resolution. Performing CHAP-SEQ using three chaperone proteins and one chaperone RNA reveals distinct modes of folding assistance. Chaperone proteins act preferentially on hydrophobic core residues, whereas chaperone RNA primarily targets structural or dynamic signatures. Furthermore, while the chaperone RNA has little preference for clients' baseline foldability, the chaperone proteins favor clients with greater intrinsic foldability. These differences are consistent with an evolutionary hypothesis in which greater chaperone complexity played a role in the formation of stable hydrophobic cores, suggesting a potential link between chaperone function and the evolution of protein folding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.15.718697
Primary Topic
Heat shock proteins research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural basis of chaperone mechanisms in cells and the evolutionary emergence of the protein world

Catherine Durso, Timothy A. Whitehead, A P Dop Son, Scott Horowitz
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Heat shock proteins research
article

Structural basis of chaperone mechanisms in cells and the evolutionary emergence of the protein world

Catherine Durso, Timothy A. Whitehead, A P Dop Son, Scott Horowitz
article en

Abstract

How chaperones mediate protein folding in the crowded cell environment remains poorly understood. To gain insight, we developed CHAP-SEQ to examine how chaperones affect protein folding in cells at high throughput and amino acid resolution. Performing CHAP-SEQ using three chaperone proteins and one chaperone RNA reveals distinct modes of folding assistance. Chaperone proteins act preferentially on hydrophobic core residues, whereas chaperone RNA primarily targets structural or dynamic signatures. Furthermore, while the chaperone RNA has little preference for clients' baseline foldability, the chaperone proteins favor clients with greater intrinsic foldability. These differences are consistent with an evolutionary hypothesis in which greater chaperone complexity played a role in the formation of stable hydrophobic cores, suggesting a potential link between chaperone function and the evolution of protein folding.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Denver (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Heat shock proteins research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structural basis of chaperone mechanisms in cells and the evolutionary emergence of the protein world — Catherine Durso, Timothy A. Whitehead, et al. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS