Advanced Insurance Risk Modeling for Pseudo-New Customers Using Balanced Ensembles and Transformer Architectures

In insurance portfolios, classifying customers without a prior history at a given company is particularly challenging due to the absence of historical behavior, extreme class imbalance, heavy-tailed loss distributions, and strict operational constraints. Traditional machine learning approaches, including the baseline methodology proposed in previous studies, typically optimize global predictive accuracy and therefore fail to capture business-critical outcomes, especially the identification of high-risk clients. This study extends the existing approach by evaluating two complementary business-aware classification strategies: (i) a balanced bagging ensemble specifically designed to handle class imbalance and maximize expected profit under explicit customer-omission constraints, and (ii) a lightweight Transformer-based architecture capable of learning richer feature representations. Both approaches incorporate the asymmetric financial cost structure of insurance and operate under operational selection limits. The empirical analysis is conducted on a proprietary large-scale auto insurance dataset comprising 51,618 customers and is complemented by validation on nine synthetic datasets to assess robustness. Model performance is evaluated using statistical tests (ANOVA, Friedman, and pair-wise comparisons) together with business-oriented metrics. The results show that both proposed approaches consistently outperform the baseline methodology (p < 0.001) in terms of profit, with the ensemble offering a better balance of performance and efficiency, while the Transformer shows stronger robustness and generalization under data perturbations. The balanced ensemble provides the most favourable trade-off between predictive performance, robustness, interpretability, and computational efficiency, making it suitable for deployment in regulated insurance environments, while the Transformer achieves competitive results and exhibits stronger generalization under data perturbations. The proposed approach aligns machine learning with actuarial portfolio optimization by explicitly integrating profit-driven objectives and operational constraints, offering two practical and scalable solutions for risk-based decision-making in real-world insurance settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14040091
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced Insurance Risk Modeling for Pseudo-New Customers Using Balanced Ensembles and Transformer Architectures

Antoni Guerrero, Angel Alejandro Juan, Raquel Soriano-Gonzalez, Finn L. Solly
Risks
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
article

Advanced Insurance Risk Modeling for Pseudo-New Customers Using Balanced Ensembles and Transformer Architectures

Antoni Guerrero, Angel Alejandro Juan, Raquel Soriano-Gonzalez, Finn L. Solly
article en

Abstract

In insurance portfolios, classifying customers without a prior history at a given company is particularly challenging due to the absence of historical behavior, extreme class imbalance, heavy-tailed loss distributions, and strict operational constraints. Traditional machine learning approaches, including the baseline methodology proposed in previous studies, typically optimize global predictive accuracy and therefore fail to capture business-critical outcomes, especially the identification of high-risk clients. This study extends the existing approach by evaluating two complementary business-aware classification strategies: (i) a balanced bagging ensemble specifically designed to handle class imbalance and maximize expected profit under explicit customer-omission constraints, and (ii) a lightweight Transformer-based architecture capable of learning richer feature representations. Both approaches incorporate the asymmetric financial cost structure of insurance and operate under operational selection limits. The empirical analysis is conducted on a proprietary large-scale auto insurance dataset comprising 51,618 customers and is complemented by validation on nine synthetic datasets to assess robustness. Model performance is evaluated using statistical tests (ANOVA, Friedman, and pair-wise comparisons) together with business-oriented metrics. The results show that both proposed approaches consistently outperform the baseline methodology (p < 0.001) in terms of profit, with the ensemble offering a better balance of performance and efficiency, while the Transformer shows stronger robustness and generalization under data perturbations. The balanced ensemble provides the most favourable trade-off between predictive performance, robustness, interpretability, and computational efficiency, making it suitable for deployment in regulated insurance environments, while the Transformer achieves competitive results and exhibits stronger generalization under data perturbations. The proposed approach aligns machine learning with actuarial portfolio optimization by explicitly integrating profit-driven objectives and operational constraints, offering two practical and scalable solutions for risk-based decision-making in real-world insurance settings.

RisksVol. 14(4)
University of Córdoba (ES), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Generalitat Valenciana, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.