Understanding Patient Perspectives on Glycemic Control: A Mixed-Methods Study of Diverse Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases risk for adverse health outcomes and disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minority populations. Achieving optimal glycemic control during pregnancy mitigates risks but requires consistent blood glucose monitoring, diet, physical activity, and, when needed, medication adherence. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators of GDM treatment adherence among racially and ethnically diverse patients with suboptimal glycemic control (<80% of glucose values/week within goal) or monitoring (<14 measurements/week) in their most recent GDM-affected pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior framework, we collected quantitative data using validated online survey tools and conducted racially concordant virtual focus groups. RESULTS Forty participants (25% Asian, 18% Black, 20% Hispanic, 23% White, 15% multiracial) completed surveys; 28 joined focus groups. Self-reported adherence was 55% for glucose monitoring, 70% for diet, and 45% for physical activity. Among those prescribed medication (n = 26), 85% reported taking it as prescribed, with higher adherence for insulin (90%) than oral agents (67%). Barriers included unsupportive workplaces, discomfort with fingersticks, limited time for activity, and frustration when goals were unmet despite perceived adherence. Although 85% reported food security, participants wanted greater nutritional support from family and community. Preferences for holistic and less invasive management, including continuous glucose monitors, were expressed. CONCLUSIONS Patients with suboptimal glycemic control or monitoring reported barriers such as workplace constraints, limited nutritional resources, and invasive treatments. Patient-centered education, community support, and expanded treatment options may improve adherence and outcomes in diverse populations with GDM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/doc25-0034
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Patient Perspectives on Glycemic Control: A Mixed-Methods Study of Diverse Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Andrea Millman, MARA GREENBERG, Sarah Cary Haynes, Bridgette P. Smith et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Understanding Patient Perspectives on Glycemic Control: A Mixed-Methods Study of Diverse Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Andrea Millman, MARA GREENBERG, Sarah Cary Haynes, Bridgette P. Smith, Annie Scandurro, Yeyi Zhu, Susan D. Brown, Assiamira Ferrara, Siedah Garrison, Hillary Serrato-Bandera
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases risk for adverse health outcomes and disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minority populations. Achieving optimal glycemic control during pregnancy mitigates risks but requires consistent blood glucose monitoring, diet, physical activity, and, when needed, medication adherence. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators of GDM treatment adherence among racially and ethnically diverse patients with suboptimal glycemic control (<80% of glucose values/week within goal) or monitoring (<14 measurements/week) in their most recent GDM-affected pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior framework, we collected quantitative data using validated online survey tools and conducted racially concordant virtual focus groups. RESULTS Forty participants (25% Asian, 18% Black, 20% Hispanic, 23% White, 15% multiracial) completed surveys; 28 joined focus groups. Self-reported adherence was 55% for glucose monitoring, 70% for diet, and 45% for physical activity. Among those prescribed medication (n = 26), 85% reported taking it as prescribed, with higher adherence for insulin (90%) than oral agents (67%). Barriers included unsupportive workplaces, discomfort with fingersticks, limited time for activity, and frustration when goals were unmet despite perceived adherence. Although 85% reported food security, participants wanted greater nutritional support from family and community. Preferences for holistic and less invasive management, including continuous glucose monitors, were expressed. CONCLUSIONS Patients with suboptimal glycemic control or monitoring reported barriers such as workplace constraints, limited nutritional resources, and invasive treatments. Patient-centered education, community support, and expanded treatment options may improve adherence and outcomes in diverse populations with GDM.

Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE
Kaiser Permanente (US), Carestream (United States) (US), Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center (US), UC Davis Health (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Institutes of Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.