Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scores and treatment recommendations from European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in curative and metastatic breast cancer (BC), and to assess inter-guideline concordance. METHODS: We conducted a comparative review of 47 systemic BC therapies with published ESMO-MCBS scores (accessed 30 June 2025). Guideline recommendations from ESMO, NCCN, and ASCO were extracted from the most recent versions and harmonized into ordinal tiers. Associations between MCBS scores and recommendation categories were evaluated using Fisher's exact test and Spearman's rank correlation in the palliative setting. Curative therapies were analyzed descriptively due to limited variability. RESULTS: = 9), most therapies received an MCBS grade A and top-tier guideline endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment between ESMO-MCBS and guideline recommendations is moderate and framework-dependent, strongest with NCCN in metastatic BC. Discordance primarily reflects differences between magnitude-of-benefit thresholds and evidence-certainty frameworks. ESMO-MCBS may serve as a complementary tool to enhance value-based clinical and policy decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33040227
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer

Intissar Yehia, Meriem Makhloufi, Khalid Al Baimani, A. Al Ajmi et al.
Current Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Association of the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) Scores with Guideline Recommendations in Breast Cancer

Intissar Yehia, Meriem Makhloufi, Khalid Al Baimani, A. Al Ajmi, Bushra Salman, Omar Ayaad, Suhaila Al Farsi, Miaad A. Al Dhahri, Roula Al Shidi, Zaid Riyadh Raouf Al Ishaq, Hadil Al Sharqi, Zayana Al Kiyumi, Saba Al Ghefeili
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scores and treatment recommendations from European Society for Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in curative and metastatic breast cancer (BC), and to assess inter-guideline concordance. METHODS: We conducted a comparative review of 47 systemic BC therapies with published ESMO-MCBS scores (accessed 30 June 2025). Guideline recommendations from ESMO, NCCN, and ASCO were extracted from the most recent versions and harmonized into ordinal tiers. Associations between MCBS scores and recommendation categories were evaluated using Fisher's exact test and Spearman's rank correlation in the palliative setting. Curative therapies were analyzed descriptively due to limited variability. RESULTS: = 9), most therapies received an MCBS grade A and top-tier guideline endorsement. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment between ESMO-MCBS and guideline recommendations is moderate and framework-dependent, strongest with NCCN in metastatic BC. Discordance primarily reflects differences between magnitude-of-benefit thresholds and evidence-certainty frameworks. ESMO-MCBS may serve as a complementary tool to enhance value-based clinical and policy decision-making.

Current OncologyVol. 33(4)
Muscat College (OM), Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (OM), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.