“Good job reporting this!”: Examining psychological needs and community building in <scp>YouTube</scp> conspiracy narratives

Abstract The proliferation of conspiracy theories online has tangible offline consequences, both on an individual and collective level. Conspiracy narratives have been associated with reduced belief in democracy, the rise of populist parties, and can act as a radicalization multiplier in such contexts. These narratives capitalize on pre‐existing beliefs and grievances and add urgency to act through a narrative of imminent danger. Previous research has proposed that belief in conspiracy narratives is driven by unfulfilled psychological needs such as existential threat, epistemic motives, and social motives and calls have been made to examine conspiracy belief as a form of affective community investment. In the present research, we explored how conspiracy narratives address grievances and psychological needs through a 1‐month digital observation of conspiracy‐related YouTube videos. We performed an LDA topic model analysis of 102 videos and 455,738 comments and qualitatively examined 24 videos and 1200 comments using an abductive approach. This study validated and extended existing models of conspiracy beliefs, highlighting how conspiracy narratives address and amplify grievances and psychological needs in both official content and community‐generated discourse. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the spread and impact of conspiracy theories in online environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70137
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Good job reporting this!”: Examining psychological needs and community building in YouTube conspiracy narratives

Darja Wischerath, Lukasz Piwek, Brittany I Davidson, Jonathan F. Roscoe
Political Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

“Good job reporting this!”: Examining psychological needs and community building in YouTube conspiracy narratives

Darja Wischerath, Lukasz Piwek, Brittany I Davidson, Jonathan F. Roscoe
article en

Abstract

Abstract The proliferation of conspiracy theories online has tangible offline consequences, both on an individual and collective level. Conspiracy narratives have been associated with reduced belief in democracy, the rise of populist parties, and can act as a radicalization multiplier in such contexts. These narratives capitalize on pre‐existing beliefs and grievances and add urgency to act through a narrative of imminent danger. Previous research has proposed that belief in conspiracy narratives is driven by unfulfilled psychological needs such as existential threat, epistemic motives, and social motives and calls have been made to examine conspiracy belief as a form of affective community investment. In the present research, we explored how conspiracy narratives address grievances and psychological needs through a 1‐month digital observation of conspiracy‐related YouTube videos. We performed an LDA topic model analysis of 102 videos and 455,738 comments and qualitatively examined 24 videos and 1200 comments using an abductive approach. This study validated and extended existing models of conspiracy beliefs, highlighting how conspiracy narratives address and amplify grievances and psychological needs in both official content and community‐generated discourse. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the spread and impact of conspiracy theories in online environments.

Political PsychologyVol. 47(3)
BT Group (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.