Predicting Stock Market Risk Using Machine Learning Classification Models

This study aims to predict stock market risk and improve preparedness for potential economic crises by identifying sharp declines in stock returns using classification-based machine learning models. Using ten years of KOSPI 200 index data (2015 to 2024), a daily return series was constructed. A day was labeled a risk event (1) if its return fell below the 5th percentile of the returns observed over the preceding 100 trading days, indicating a sharp decline. Nine classification models—Logistic Regression, k-nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, AdaBoost, and Gradient Boosting—were trained and validated. Among these, Logistic Regression demonstrated the strongest overall performance across multiple evaluation metrics, including accuracy, non-risk F1 score, risk F1 score, and AUC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14040092
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Stock Market Risk Using Machine Learning Classification Models

Seol-Hyun Noh
Risks
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Predicting Stock Market Risk Using Machine Learning Classification Models

Seol-Hyun Noh
article en

Abstract

This study aims to predict stock market risk and improve preparedness for potential economic crises by identifying sharp declines in stock returns using classification-based machine learning models. Using ten years of KOSPI 200 index data (2015 to 2024), a daily return series was constructed. A day was labeled a risk event (1) if its return fell below the 5th percentile of the returns observed over the preceding 100 trading days, indicating a sharp decline. Nine classification models—Logistic Regression, k-nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, AdaBoost, and Gradient Boosting—were trained and validated. Among these, Logistic Regression demonstrated the strongest overall performance across multiple evaluation metrics, including accuracy, non-risk F1 score, risk F1 score, and AUC.

RisksVol. 14(4)
Hongik University (KR)
Hongik University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.